Evaluation of root resorption following rapid maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBaysal, Asli
dc.contributor.authorKaradede, Irfan
dc.contributor.authorHekimoglu, Seyit
dc.contributor.authorUcar, Faruk
dc.contributor.authorOzer, Torun
dc.contributor.authorVeli, Ilknur
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Tancan
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:18:45Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:18:45Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the root resorption after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: Records of 25 patients who had undergone RME with tooth-borne banded expander were obtained from the archive of the orthodontic department. CBCT data were reconstructed with surface and volume rendering, and the volumetric images were manipulated to display the root surfaces from various orientations. On these three-dimensional images, permanent first molars and first and second premolars were segmented, and their roots were isolated. Volumes of roots were calculated. The difference between pre-expansion and postexpansion root volumes was statistically evaluated with a paired-samples t-test. Also, the percentage of root volume loss was calculated for each root and statistically compared with each other with one-way analysis of variance at the P < .05 level. Results: The difference between the pre-expansion and postexpansion root volumes was statistically significant for all roots investigated. Maximum volume decrease was observed for the mesiobuccal root of first molar teeth (18.60 mm(3)). It was determined that the distobuccal root of first molar teeth was less affected from the expansion procedure (9.47 mm(3)). No statistically significant difference was found for the percentage of root volume loss. Conclusion: Following RME treatment, significant root volume loss was observed for all investigated posterior teeth. However, the percentage of volume loss was not statistically different among roots. (Angle Orthod. 2012;82:488-494.)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2319/060411-367.1
dc.identifier.endpage494en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219
dc.identifier.issn1945-7103
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84861328781
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage488en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2319/060411-367.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/18897
dc.identifier.volume82en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000303784000014
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherE H Angle Education Research Foundation, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAngle Orthodontist
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRoot Resorptionen_US
dc.subjectRapid Maxillary Expansionen_US
dc.subjectCone-Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of root resorption following rapid maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of root resorption following rapid maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu