The effect of different suture materials on the safety of colon anastomosis in an experimental peritonitis model

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorArikanoglu, Z.
dc.contributor.authorCetinkaya, Z.
dc.contributor.authorAkbulut, S.
dc.contributor.authorIlhan, Y. S.
dc.contributor.authorAygen, E.
dc.contributor.authorBasbug, M.
dc.contributor.authorAyten, R.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:47:57Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:47:57Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The aim of this experimental study was to compare the safety of different suture materials in a left colonic anastomosis in the presence of peritonitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one male Wistar albino rats were randomly divided into three groups. First, left colonic injuries were created in all groups for the peritonitis model. After 24 hours, coated polyglactin 910 and silk suture were used in Group I rats, polydioxanone and silk suture were used in Group II rats, and coated polyglactin 910 plus antibacterial suture and silk suture were used in Group III rats during colonic anastomosis. Tissue hydroxyproline, anastomotic bursting pressure, and histopathologic findings on the anastomosis line were evaluated on the 10th postoperative day by performing a relaparatomy. RESULTS: The mean bursting pressure values were 198 +/- 11.37, 220 +/- 17.7, and 244 +/- 9.52 in Groups I, II, and III, respectively (Group I vs. II, p < 0.035; I vs III, p < 0.002; and II vs III, p < 0.021). The mean hydroxyproline levels were 1.21 +/- 0.58, 1.47 +/- 0.44, and 2.11 +/- 0.32 in Groups I, II, and III, respectively (Group I vs II, p < 0.338; I vs III, p < 0.011; and II vs III, p < 0.025). When histopathologic findings of the groups were compared, the healing score of the intestinal tissue was higher in Group III than in Group I (p < 0.015), whereas there were no statistically significant differences among Groups I vs II and II vs III (p < 0.081 and p < 0.095, respectively). CONCLUSION: Antibacterial suture usage increased anastomosis safety in the presence of peritonitis in resection and primary anastomosis.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2593en_US
dc.identifier.issn1128-3602
dc.identifier.issue19en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24142603
dc.identifier.startpage2587en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/22823
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000326270500005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVerduci Publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Review For Medical and Pharmacological Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectColon Anastomosisen_US
dc.subjectAntibacterial Sutureen_US
dc.subjectPeritonitisen_US
dc.titleThe effect of different suture materials on the safety of colon anastomosis in an experimental peritonitis modelen_US
dc.titleThe effect of different suture materials on the safety of colon anastomosis in an experimental peritonitis model
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu