Hydatid Disease of the Spleen: Single-Center Experience and a Brief Literature Review

[ X ]

Tarih

2013

Dergi Başlığı

Dergi ISSN

Cilt Başlığı

Yayıncı

Springer

Erişim Hakkı

info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Özet

The aim of this study was to discuss the management of patients with splenic hydatid cyst (SHC) and to provide a review of the literature in this field. The outcomes of patients surgically treated for SHC at the Diyarbakir Education and Research Hospital (DERH) between January 2006 and May 2013 were assessed by retrospectively reviewing demographic, radiological, and clinical data. In addition, the outcome profiles of these patients were compared to the overall outcomes of surgically treated SHC cases reported in the literature. Relevant case series (a parts per thousand yen4 cases) were identified by searching the PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar databases for publications from 1990 to May 2013 in English or Turkish languages. Nine patients with SHC received surgical treatment at DERH (age range, 18-53 years old; mean, 36.9 +/- 11.8; female/male, 7/2), including five (55.6 %) primary SHC and four (44.4 %) secondary (100 % liver) SHC cases. Two patients had previous SHC surgery. Seven patients received albendazole therapy, both preoperative (10-21 days) and postoperative (10-42 days) periods. All patients received vaccination, either preoperative (n = 4) or postoperative (n = 5). Six patients underwent splenectomy and three underwent splenectomy with partial cystectomy and omentopexy, and no patient experienced SHC recurrence during follow-up (1-60 months). The literature review identified 27 full-text articles representing 333 surgically treated SHC cases, among which 60.5 % had primary SHC and 39.5 % had secondary SHC. Two hundred thirty of 333 patients underwent splenectomy, 81 underwent spleen-sparing surgery, and 17 underwent puncture, aspiration, injection, and reaspiration. The remaining five patients were not operated for various reasons. We found no significant difference in recurrence rates between splenectomy and spleen-sparing surgery, either in our patient cohort or among cases reported in the literature. Nevertheless, we cannot make any solid recommendations for either procedure based on these results, as the studies were largely retrospective.

Açıklama

Anahtar Kelimeler

Spleen, Hydatid Cyst, Splenic Hydatid Cyst, Splenectomy, Spleen-Sparing Surgery

Kaynak

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

WoS Q Değeri

Q2

Scopus Q Değeri

Cilt

17

Sayı

10

Künye