The Comparison of Different Surface Preparation Methods in Terms of Shear Bond Strength of Tri-ceram Porcelain-titanium Alloy

dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Berivan Dundar
dc.contributor.authorMese, Ayse
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Eylem
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:24:26Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:24:26Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Several studies have been made to evaluate effects of the surface preparation on shear bond strength (SBS) of titanium-porcelain complex. However, a completed picture has not been obtained yet. Therefore, such studies appear frequently on recent literature. The purpose of this study is to determine a simple method providing strong SBS and using fewer parameters. Materials and Methods: Sixty titanium samples were equally divided into five groups. Group 1: Control (C). Group 2: Airborne-particle abrasion with 250 mu Al2O3 (250 mu AbPA). Group 3: Etching with 10% HCl (10% HCl). Group 4: Etching with Nd:YAG Laser at 6W (Nd6). Group 5: Etching with Nd:YAG laser at 7 W (Nd7). Results: Mean SBS value of C (10.69 MPa) was close to that of 250 mu AbPA (10.57 MPa). The mean value of 10% HCl (19.37 MPa) was nearly twice higher than C, whereas those of laser groups (8.89 MPa and 8.77 MPa) were smaller than C. There was no overlap between SBS values of samples etched with 10% HCl and those of other samples. Multiple comparisons indicated a significant difference between acid group and others (p=0.00). Laser groups were different from control, too. The failure mode of % HCl group was 67% adhesive and 33% mix, while those of other groups were cohesive or mix. Conclusion: Titanium surfaces etched with 10% HCl provides significantly strong SBS values. This method requires only the use of aqueous solution of 10% HCl, and boiling process for 30 minutes. Such a simplicity suggests that etching with 10% HCl provides a very simple surface preparation method which involves in use of fewer parameters.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDUAPK (Research Foundation of Dicle University) [06DH-09]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAuthors thank to DUAPK (Research Foundation of Dicle University)-06DH-09 for financial support.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/meandros.galenos.2018.70783
dc.identifier.endpage143en_US
dc.identifier.issn2149-9063
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage137en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid363303
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2018.70783
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/363303
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/19671
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000511859200006
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGalenos Yayinciliken_US
dc.relation.ispartofMeandros Medical and Dental Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectShear Bond Strengthen_US
dc.subjectTitanium Alloyen_US
dc.subjectSurface Preparationen_US
dc.subjectTri-Ceram Porcelainen_US
dc.titleThe Comparison of Different Surface Preparation Methods in Terms of Shear Bond Strength of Tri-ceram Porcelain-titanium Alloyen_US
dc.titleThe Comparison of Different Surface Preparation Methods in Terms of Shear Bond Strength of Tri-ceram Porcelain-titanium Alloy
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar