Effect of rifampin in combination with allogeneic, alloplastic, and heterogenous bone grafts on bone regeneration in rat tibial bone defects

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Alper
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Beyza
dc.contributor.authorAktas, Ayfer
dc.contributor.authorFirat, Ela Tules
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T16:10:45Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T16:10:45Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of rifampin with allogeneic, alloplastic, and heterogeneous bone graft substitutes on osteogenesis of experimentally created bone defects in rat tibias. Materials and methods: Twenty-eight male Wistar albino rats were used in this study. In each animal, two bone defects (10 mm length x 3 mm width x 2 mm depth) were created in the left and right tibias, respectively. The animals were divided into four groups. In Group 1, the right defects were irrigated with rifampin alone, and the left defects were irrigated with sterile saline alone. In Group 2, the right defects were filled with rifampin and allogeneic bone graft, and the left defects were filled with allogeneic bone graft alone. In Group 3, the right defects were treated with rifampin and alloplastic bone graft, and the left defects were filled with alloplastic bone graft alone. In Group 4, the right defects were filled with rifampin and heterogeneous bone graft, and the left defects were filled with heterogeneous bone graft alone. Results: The animals were sacrified on the 21st postoperative day. Histopathological analysis of samples was performed to evaluate the process of bone regeneration and the presence of spongeous bone, cortex bone, and bone marrow. Bone union (p = 0.023) and spongeous bone (p = 0.030) values were higher in Group 1A (rifampin alone) than those in Group 1B (saline alone). Bone union (p<0.001) and spongeous bone (p<0.001) values in Group 2B (allograft + saline) were higher than those in Group 2A (allograft + rifampin). These differences were statistically significant. Conclusions: Topical rifampin can accelerate the bone repair process, but the combination of rifampin and allogeneic bone grafts can also reduce new bone formation in osseous defects. Further studies involving long-term follow-up with a larger number of cases and different antibiotic agents should be conducted. These will provide additional data regarding new bone formation, especially in contaminated bone defects, resulting from use of antibiotic-supplemented bone grafts. (C) 2013 Asian AOMS, ASOMP, JSOP, JSOMS, JSOM, and JAMI. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.*en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajoms.2013.08.001
dc.identifier.endpage28en_US
dc.identifier.issn2212-5558
dc.identifier.issn2212-5566
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84930377481
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage20en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoms.2013.08.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/15089
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000371595100005
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine and Pathology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOsteogenesisen_US
dc.subjectRifampinen_US
dc.subjectBone Healingen_US
dc.subjectBone Graften_US
dc.titleEffect of rifampin in combination with allogeneic, alloplastic, and heterogenous bone grafts on bone regeneration in rat tibial bone defectsen_US
dc.titleEffect of rifampin in combination with allogeneic, alloplastic, and heterogenous bone grafts on bone regeneration in rat tibial bone defects
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu