Seed Viability and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) Cultivars Threshed by Different Types of Beaters and Concaves

dc.contributor.authorPeksen, Erkut
dc.contributor.authorKoyuncu, Turhan
dc.contributor.authorArtik, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorSessiz, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorPinar, Yunus
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:38:01Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:38:01Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractEffects of different beater-as spike-tooth, lama-tooth and wire loop-, and concave- PVC and chrome- types used in threshing of Cicer arietinum L. cvs. Akcin-91, Kusmen-99 cultivars and Local variety on germination speed and power, electrical conductivity of seed leachate, field emergence, phenological growth and seed yields of autumn and spring sown chickpea under rainfed condition were investigated. The experiments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with a factorial arrangement of treatments containing three replications. Visually undamaged seeds from all threshing treatments were used in both laboratory and field experiments. No significant differences were found among beaters and concave types regarding electrical conductivity, germination speed and power and also seed yield and 100-seed weight, while chickpea genotypes were differed for all these traits. Field emergence was significantly decreased in autumn sowing, when spike-toot beater used in the stationary threshing unit. Threshing efficiency of lama-tooth beater (93.91%), which has the highest unthreshed seed rate and total seed losses, was significantly lower than that in spike-tooth (97.73%) and wire loop (96.35%). Beaters were not differed for threshing efficiency. Akcin-91 and Kusmen-99 gave higher threshing efficiency than Local variety. (C) 2013 Friends Science Publishersen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnit of Scientific Research Projects of Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey [Z-379]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors wish to thank the Unit of Scientific Research Projects of Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey due to valuable support for the project Z-379.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage82en_US
dc.identifier.issn1560-8530
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84873022153
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage76en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/21290
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000313738400011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFriends Science Publen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Agriculture and Biology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBeateren_US
dc.subjectChickpeaen_US
dc.subjectConcaveen_US
dc.subjectSeed Viabilityen_US
dc.subjectSeed Yielden_US
dc.subjectThreshingen_US
dc.titleSeed Viability and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) Cultivars Threshed by Different Types of Beaters and Concavesen_US
dc.titleSeed Viability and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) Cultivars Threshed by Different Types of Beaters and Concaves
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar