Do ozone and boric acid affect microleakage in class V composite restorations?

dc.contributor.authorCangul, Suzan
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Zehra Susgun
dc.contributor.authorBahsi, Emrullah
dc.contributor.authorSagmak, Savas
dc.contributor.authorSatici, Omer
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T16:24:30Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T16:24:30Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of chlorhexidine gluconate (2%), sodium hypochloride (2.5%), ozone gas, and boric acid at different concentrations (1%, 3%, 5%, and 7%) on microleakage from composite restorations.In a total of 80 extracted human canine teeth, a class V cavity was opened on the buccal surface and the samples were separated into eight groups. In the control group, no procedure was applied for cavity disinfection, then composite restoration (Z250, 3M) was made using single-stage, self-etch adhesive (Single Bond 3M). In the other groups, seven different disinfectants were used, then the cavity was restored. The teeth were split into two in the buccolingual direction, parallel to the long axes. Stain penetration was examined under stereomicroscope and scored. Examination with SEM was made on one sample from each group, selected at random. Statistical evaluations were made using Dunnett C Post Hoc Comparison and Kruskal-Wallis H tests.In the occlusal region evaluation, the groups with the lowest level of leakage were the 3% and 5% boric acid groups, and the highest levels of microleakage were determined in the chlorhexidine group and the 1% boric acid group. In the gingival region, the lowest level of microleakage was in the 5% boric acid group and the highest levels were determined in the 1% and 7% boric acid groups.Boric acid disinfectants used at suitable concentrations were not seen to create a risk in respect of microleakage.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01919512.2018.1476128
dc.identifier.endpage101en_US
dc.identifier.issn0191-9512
dc.identifier.issn1547-6545
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85047824984
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage92en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01919512.2018.1476128
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/16744
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000461778400009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOzone-Science & Engineering
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBoric Aciden_US
dc.subjectClass V Restorationen_US
dc.subjectDental Applicationsen_US
dc.subjectDisinfectionen_US
dc.subjectMicroleakageen_US
dc.subjectOzoneen_US
dc.titleDo ozone and boric acid affect microleakage in class V composite restorations?en_US
dc.titleDo ozone and boric acid affect microleakage in class V composite restorations?
dc.typeReview Articleen_US

Dosyalar