Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Ozone, Diode Laser, and Traditional Cavity Disinfectants on Microleakage

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorGunes, Sifa
dc.contributor.authorBahsi, Emrullah
dc.contributor.authorInce, Bayram
dc.contributor.authorColak, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorDalli, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Izzet
dc.contributor.authorSahbaz, Cafer
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T16:24:30Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T16:24:30Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: This study aimed to evaluate the effects on microleakage of the application of ozone gas, laser and traditional cavity disinfection under in vitro conditions. Material and Methods: Ninety third-molar teeth extracted for various reasons were used in this study. All the teeth were prepared with a standard V cavity on the buccal surface. Then the teeth were randomly allocated to one of 6 groups of 15 teeth; Group 1 benzalkonium chloride, Group 2 chlorhexidine gluconate, Group 3 sodium hypochloride, Group 4 diode laser, Group 5 ozone gas, Group 6 control group- no disinfection was applied. Primer was applied to the cavities, then bond and 10-s polymerization. Clearfil AP-X was used in the cavities as a hybrid composite and polymerized for 20 s. The samples then underwent 1000 thermal cycles of 30-s application, in baths at temperatures between 5 +/- 2 degrees C and 55 +/- 2 degrees C. All the samples were stirred in 0.5% basic phuxine solution and the sections taken under stereomicroscope were examined and photographed at 15 x magnification. SEM analysis was made and the obtained results were statistically evaluated with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: No significant difference was seen between the groups in respect of the microleakage values of both the occlusal and gingival edges (p < 0.05). Comparison of the microleakage values of the occlusal and gingival edges of the groups determined the least leakage to be in the ozone group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: No statistical significance was determined between the groups. However, the mean least microleakage was found in the ozone group and the highest amount in the control group.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDicle University Scientific Research Projects Co-ordination Departmenten_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by Dicle University Scientific Research Projects Co-ordination Department.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01919512.2013.842888
dc.identifier.endpage211en_US
dc.identifier.issn0191-9512
dc.identifier.issn1547-6545
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84898629203
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage206en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01919512.2013.842888
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/16743
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000334266500011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOzone-Science & Engineering
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDiode Laseren_US
dc.subjectCavity Disinfectanten_US
dc.subjectDental Applicationsen_US
dc.subjectSodium Hypochlorideen_US
dc.subjectOzoneen_US
dc.subjectChlorhexidine Gluconateen_US
dc.titleComparative Evaluation of the Effects of Ozone, Diode Laser, and Traditional Cavity Disinfectants on Microleakageen_US
dc.titleComparative Evaluation of the Effects of Ozone, Diode Laser, and Traditional Cavity Disinfectants on Microleakage
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu