Enviroeconomic optimization of insulation thickness for building exterior walls through thermoeconomic and life cycle assessment analysis
dc.authorid | 0000-0003-0229-2943 | |
dc.contributor.author | Akyüz, Mehmet Kadri | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-22T14:09:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-22T14:09:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
dc.department | Dicle Üniversitesi, Sivil Havacılık Yüksek Okulu, Havacılık Yönetimi Bölümü | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The economic optimum insulation thicknesses (OIT) for heated buildings in five different climate regions in Turkiye were determined, and the energy, cost, and life cycle-based environmental performances were analyzed. Calculations were performed using three different fuels (natural gas, fuel oil, and coal) and four different insulation materials: expanded polystyrene (EPS), rock wool (RW), glass wool (GW), and extruded polystyrene (XPS). This study utilized a thermoeconomic approach to evaluate energy and economic performance and a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach to assess environmental impacts, ensuring a comprehensive analysis of insulation strategies. The impacts of climate change factors were expressed as kg CO2 equivalent (kgCO2eq) using 100-years global warming potential (GWP). The annual energy savings varying from 18.41 to 258.15 kWh/(year.m2) for the warmer and the colder climate zones, respectively. The maximum avoided environmental impact (AEI) due to energy saved from thermal insulation was 144.11 kgCO2eq/(year.m2) for coal and RW in coldest climate zone, while the minimum AEI was 5.31 kgCO2eq/(year.m2) for natural gas and XPS in warmest climate zone. Among insulation materials, EPS offers the shortest environmental payback period, whereas RW requires the longest, highlighting material-specific trade-offs. In all climate zones, environmental payback periods are much shorter than economic ones. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | suggestions. Their insights have significantly improved the quality of this manuscript. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Akyüz, M. K. (2025). Enviroeconomic optimization of insulation thickness for building exterior walls through thermoeconomic and life cycle assessment analysis. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 65, 1-17. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.csite.2024.105606 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2214-157X | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85211057934 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2024.105606 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11468/29767 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 65 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001375350300001 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.institutionauthor | Akyuz, Mehmet Kadri | |
dc.institutionauthorid | 0000-0003-0229-2943 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Case Studies in Thermal Engineering | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.snmz | KA_WOS_20250222 | |
dc.subject | Thermal analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Greenhouse gas mitigation | en_US |
dc.subject | Optimum insulation thickness | en_US |
dc.subject | Building performance | en_US |
dc.subject | Life cycle assessment | en_US |
dc.title | Enviroeconomic optimization of insulation thickness for building exterior walls through thermoeconomic and life cycle assessment analysis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Dosyalar
Orijinal paket
1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
- İsim:
- Enviroeconomic optimization of insulation thickness for building exterior walls through thermoeconomic and life cycle assessment analysis.pdf
- Boyut:
- 2.67 MB
- Biçim:
- Adobe Portable Document Format