Comparison of the Effects of Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco “Maras Powder” Use on Pulmonary Function, Electrocardiogram and Other Parameters

dc.contributor.authorTaylan, Maşuk
dc.contributor.authorKasapoğlu, Umut Sabri
dc.contributor.authorGüney, Pınar Atagün
dc.contributor.authorAtilla, Nurhan
dc.contributor.authorIrmak, İlim
dc.contributor.authorArpag, Hüseyin
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T19:11:35Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T19:11:35Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Through the years, tobacco has been used in many ways. While the most common way of consumption is through smoking cigarettes, smokeless use bychewing or nasal snuffing are also quite common. Smokeless tobacco, also named “Maras powder”, is generally used as a substitute to reduce or quit smoking. Theeffects of smokeless tobacco use on the immune system, respiratory system and cardiovascular system have been extensively researched. In our study, we aimed toinvestigate the effects of Maras powder on the respiratory, electrocardiogram (ECG) findings and biochemical methods.Methods: One hundred and forty-nine cases were included and the cases were classified into the following four groups: only using Maras powder; using Maras powderand smoking; only smoking and control group neither smoking nor using Maras powder. Physical examination findings, ECG findings, results of pulmonary functiontests, results of biochemical analysis including complete blood count and lipid profile of all participants were recorded on admission.Results: The risk of mouth sores was 7.9 times higher in the Maras powder group due to direct contact to the oral mucosa. There is a relationship between the daily usefrequency of smokeless tobacco and the development of oral wounds, but the total period of use or the duration in mouth was not related to this situation. The ECGfindings of both the smoking and Maras powder consuming group was found to be significantly higher than the control group.Conclusion: The smokeless tobacco use, which is considered as an alternative way of quitting smoking, does not have adverse effects on respiratory functions. However,it is an important risk factor for many life-threatening health conditions such as ECG abnormalities and occurrence of oral lesions. Social awareness must be created forsmokeless tobacco use in order to fight this habitual threat to public health.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/eamr.galenos.2019.94809
dc.identifier.endpage240en_US
dc.identifier.issn2651-3137
dc.identifier.issn2651-3153
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage233en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid331063
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/eamr.galenos.2019.94809
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/331063
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/28097
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Archives of Medical Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleComparison of the Effects of Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco “Maras Powder” Use on Pulmonary Function, Electrocardiogram and Other Parametersen_US
dc.titleComparison of the Effects of Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco “Maras Powder” Use on Pulmonary Function, Electrocardiogram and Other Parameters
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar