Comparison of general and spinal anaesthesia in pregnant women with pregnancy induced hypertension
dc.contributor.author | Turhanoglu S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tok D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozyilmaz M.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bayhan N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Olmez G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kaya S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yayla M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-24T17:58:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-24T17:58:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | |
dc.department | Dicle Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The technique of anaesthesia may become important when caeseraen section will be necessary instead of vaginal delivery in pregnant women with pregnancy induced hypertension. In our study, we compared general versus spinal anaesthesia in hypertensive pregnant women who had the same clinical conditions. Sixty pregnant women had taken to the study and allocated randomly into two groups. In the first group (n=30) general anaesthesia, and in second group (n=30) spinal anaesthesia were administered to the patients. Heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) in the periods of pre, per (1., 3., 5. minutes and every 5 minute for thirty minutes) and postoperative (1., 30. and 60. minutes), APGAR scores at 1. and 5. minutes, uterine incision-cordon clamping time (Ui-Cc) and the time of first analgesic requirement in the postoperative period were recorded. The values of HR, SAP and DAP were significantly lower in the group of spinal anaesthesia (p<0.05). APGAR scores at the first minute were found significantly better in the group of spinal anaesthesia than the group of general anaesthesia (p<0.05). The times of first analgesic requirements were significantly shorter in the group of general anaesthesia (p<0.05). We concluded that spinal anaesthesia may be performed in preeclamptic women undergoing caeserean section with safe if the anaesthesiologist takes the necessary measures. | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 485 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1016-5150 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-0033377062 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 480 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11468/24119 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 27 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.language.iso | tr | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Turk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | General Anaesthesia | en_US |
dc.subject | Pregnancy İnduced Hypertension | en_US |
dc.subject | Spinal Anaesthesia | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of general and spinal anaesthesia in pregnant women with pregnancy induced hypertension | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Gebeligin olusturdugu hipertansiyonlu olgularda genel ve spinal anestezinin karsilastirilmasi | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |