Comparison of approaches in tuberculosis diagnosis between dispensary and chest diseases clinics and defects into practice

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAbakay A.
dc.contributor.authorAbakay Ö.
dc.contributor.authorTanrikulu A.Ç.
dc.contributor.authorCoşkunsel M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T18:43:39Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T18:43:39Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractTuberculosis (TB) is an important health problem for our country. Tuberculosis conrol dispensaries (TCD) undertake important functions in application of national TB control programme. In this study, comparison of diagnosis methods in TB is aimed between Diyarbakir No.1 TCD and chest diseases clinics. The data of 360 cases were investigated retrospectively in Diyarbakir No.1 TCD. Systematic sample method was used in the selection of this cases within registered 916 cases between January 200? and December 2004. It was found that cases were as 270 (% 75) pulmonary TB and 90 (% 25) extra pulmonary TB. Pulmonary tuberculosis cases were as 172 (% 63.7) of smear positive 98 (% 36.3) of smear negative. Bacteriological and nonbacteriological methods were used in the 117 (% 72.2) cases and 45 (% 27.8) cases of 162 cases as diagnosed at pulmonary TB chest diseases clinics, respectively. Bacteriological and nonbacteriological methods were used in the 58 (% 64.4) cases and 32 (% 35.6) cases of 90 cases as diagnosed at pulmonary TB Diyarbakir No. 1 TCD, respectively. It was found that the diagnosis of 15 (% 46.8) cases that diagnosed by nonbacteriological methods at TCD was determinated to be as false by chest diseases clinics that have different diagnosis possibility. It was determinated that the mean treatment time was 7.51 ± 2.90 month. It was found that the 56 (% 15.6) cases were made some errors according to treatmet regime or treatment time. The false rate was found to be high when used nonbacteriological methods at TCD. National TB programme is suggested that smear negative cases are sent to health centers having different diagnosis possibility. As a result of, our study is in agreement this suggestion.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage90en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-526X
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33845644109en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage86en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/24263
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofGoztepe Tip Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFalse Diagnosisen_US
dc.subjectSputum Smearen_US
dc.subjectTuberculosisen_US
dc.titleComparison of approaches in tuberculosis diagnosis between dispensary and chest diseases clinics and defects into practiceen_US
dc.title.alternativeDispanser ve göğüs hastaliklari klinikleri arasinda tüberküloz tanisina yaklaşimlarinin karşilaş tirilmasi ve uygulamadaki hatalaren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu