Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles

Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim

Tarih

2021

Dergi Başlığı

Dergi ISSN

Cilt Başlığı

Yayıncı

Uluslararası Diş Araştırmaları Birliği

Erişim Hakkı

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Özet

Aim: To compare the amount of apically extruded debris using Reciproc (R25) file with different reciprocal angles. Methodology: In this research, 60 extracted mandibular premolars with a single root, a single canal, and a single apical foramen were used. Specimens, the working length of which was determined by a stainless steel 10-K file, were randomly distributed into three experimental groups (n = 20) as follows: Group 1 150° counterclockwise (CCW)-30° clockwise (CW); Group 2 180° CCW-60° CW; and Group 3 210° CCW-90° CW. For the irrigation, 10 mL of distilled water was administered via a syringe pump. The extruded debris was collected into Eppendorf tubes tared in advance. The distribution of data was analyzed using a Shapiro-Wilk test. A KruskalWallis H test was used for statistical analysis. The null hypothesis is no significant difference between the groups in terms of the amount of apical extrusion of debris. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to amount of apical extrusion of debris (p>0.05). Nevertheless, the highest average amount of extrusion of debris was detected in group 1 and the lowest in group 3. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, different reciprocal angles during chemomechanical preparation have no significant effect on the amount of apical extrusion of debris.

Açıklama

Anahtar Kelimeler

Reciproc, Kinematics, Reciprocation, Debris extrusion

Kaynak

International Dental Research

WoS Q Değeri

Scopus Q Değeri

Cilt

11

Sayı

Supplement 1

Künye

Çelik, N., Kaya, S. ve Adıgüzel, Ö. (2021). Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles. International Dental Research, 11(Supplement 1), 63-66.