The effectiveness of scoring systems and various biochemical parameters in predicting survival in a respiratory intensive care unit

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYildiz T.
dc.contributor.authorGündo?uş B.
dc.contributor.authorAteş G.
dc.contributor.authorAkyildiz L.
dc.contributor.authorÇelik Y.
dc.contributor.authorTopçu F.
dc.contributor.authorCanoruç N.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:59:00Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:59:00Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of the present study was to compare various clinical and biochemical parameters, Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) for their effectiveness in distinguishing surviving and non-surviving patients who had acute respiratory failure (ARF) while in the Respiratory Intensive Care Unit (RICU). Materials and Methods: A prospective observational clinical study was carried out in the RICU of the Chest Disease Clinic. One hundred and sixteen patients were observed. Laboratory parameters and scoring points for the first 24 hours were recorded. Patients' demographic characteristics, biochemical parameters, length of stay at the RICU, and GCS, APACHE II and SOFA scores were also recorded. The primary outcome of the current study was the mortality rate in the RICU. Results: Mortality rate was determined to be 39.6% (46 patients) of 116 patients, although the predicted mortality rate was 49.7%. There was a statistically significant difference between surviving and non-surviving patients in terms of SOFA (p= 0.004, OR= 1.33, CI= 1.10-1.61), INR (p = 0.02, OR = 3.95, CI = 1.30-12.07), albumin (p= 0.02, OR= 2.58, CI= 1.17-5.64), and PCO2 levels (p= 0.005, OR= 1.04, CI= 1.01-1.06), respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the mortality rate may be higher when SOFA, INR, albumin and PCO2 abnormalities are seen. Co-morbidities such as non-pulmonary organ dysfunction and metabolic disorders other than respiratory failure may have contributed additionally to increased mortality risk for patients who were admitted to the RICU. These parameters should be taken into account when ARF patients are admitted to the RICU. 2010 © TurkJBiochem.com.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage132en_US
dc.identifier.issn1303-829X
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77954743774en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage128en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/24187
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherTurkish Biochemistry Societyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Biochemistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBiochemical Parametersen_US
dc.subjectMortalityen_US
dc.subjectOutcomeen_US
dc.subjectRespiratory Icuen_US
dc.titleThe effectiveness of scoring systems and various biochemical parameters in predicting survival in a respiratory intensive care uniten_US
dc.title.alternativeSolunumsal yo?un bakım ünitesi'nde skorlama sistemlerinin ve çeşitli biyokimyasal verilerin yaşam beklentisine etkisien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu