Evaluation of the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer enhanced with bioactive glass to composite resin with different dental adhesive systems

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBakir Ş.
dc.contributor.authorBakir E.P.
dc.contributor.authorAkbiyik S.Y.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T18:46:35Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T18:46:35Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To investigate the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer enhanced with bioactive glass (Activa BioActive-Base/Liner) to composite resin using different dental adhesive systems. STUDY DESIGN: In this study, Activa BioActive-Base/Liner (ABA/BL) was placed in cylindrical cavities formed in acrylic blocks. In blocks divided into 6 groups according to the adhesive system to be applied, two-step etch-and-rinse Gluma 2 Bond (Heraeus Kulzer, Germany), one-step self-etch Gluma Self Etch (Heraeus Kulzer), universal system Gluma Universal (Heraeus Kulzer), two-step self-etch Clearfil SE Protect (Kuraray, Japan), one-step self-etch Clearfil S3 Bond Plus (Kuraray), and universal system Clearfil S3 Bond Universal (Kuraray) adhesive systems were applied on ABA/BL. After composite resin (3M ESPE Filtek Ultimate) was applied to the prepared surfaces, the specimens were placed in a universal test device and shear bond strength test was determined. Fracture types were evaluated using a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed by Shapiro-Wilk, two-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Post-Hoc Multiple Comparisons tests. RESULTS: In terms of bond strength values, the highest bond value was seen in the two-step self-etch (Clearfil SE Protect) group, and the lowest bond strength value was seen in the universal system (Clearfil S3 Bond Universal) group. There was no statistically significant difference between the adhesive agent groups in terms of bond strength values (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: It is thought that choosing the two-step self-etch technique as an adhesive system when resin-modified glass ionomer enhanced with bioactive glass (ABA/BL) is used as the pulp capping/base material will be more appropriate in terms of bond strength. © Science Printers and Publishers, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage241en_US
dc.identifier.issn2578-742X
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85119520886
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage235en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/25256
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScience Printers and Publishers Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnalytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdhesive Systemsen_US
dc.subjectBioactive Materialsen_US
dc.subjectBond Strengthen_US
dc.subjectCariostatic Agentsen_US
dc.subjectComposite Resinsen_US
dc.subjectDental Materialsen_US
dc.subjectFluoridesen_US
dc.subjectGlass İonomeren_US
dc.subjectGlass İonomer Cementsen_US
dc.subjectMaterials Testingen_US
dc.subjectVital Pulp Therapyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer enhanced with bioactive glass to composite resin with different dental adhesive systemsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer enhanced with bioactive glass to composite resin with different dental adhesive systems
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu