Comparison of Vertical C/D Ratio Obtained by Assistant of Ophthalmology with Results of Optical Cohorence Tomography

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSakalar, Yildirim Bayezit
dc.contributor.authorUnlu, Kaan
dc.contributor.authorKeklikci, Selahattin Ugur
dc.contributor.authorCaca, Ihsan
dc.contributor.authorAri, Seyhmus
dc.contributor.authorBalsak, Selahattin
dc.contributor.authorAkkus, Zeki
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:44:49Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:44:49Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare vertical C/D ratio that measured with ophthalmoscopic examination of second, third and fourth year assistant of ophthalmology with vertical C/D ratio obtained by optical cohorence tomography. Materials and Methods: One hundred and ten eyes of 72 glaucoma patients which are followed in glaucoma unit were included to study. Each assistant examined vertical C/D ratio by Goldman tree mirror lens and results were recorded independently from results of the other assistants. The measurements of vertical C/D ratio were obtained by optic nerve head analyses of Stratus Optical Cohorence Tomography after pupillary dilatation and vertical C/D ratio were enlisted. All measurements of vertical C/D ratio were compared each other. Results: Thirty patients were male and 42 patients were female, mean age was 51.43 +/- 19.2. Mean vertical C/D ratio measured by second year asisstant was 0.556 +/- 0.246, mean vertical C/D ratio measured by third year assistant was 0.534 +/- 0.251, mean vertical C/D ratio measured by fourth year assistant was 0.529 +/- 0.250. Mean vertical C/D ratio obtained by optical cohorence tomography was 0.651 +/- 0.223. There was no statistically signicant differences among vertical C/D ratio measured by assistants (p>0.05). The mean vertical C/D ratio that measured by each assistant was statistically lower than obtained by optical cohorence tomography (p<0.05). Conclusions: The vertical C/D ratio that measured with ophthalmoscopic examination by assistant of ophthalmology will be different from vertical C/D ratio obtained by optic nerve head analyses of optical cohorence tomography.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage32en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0659
dc.identifier.issn2147-2661
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage28en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/22299
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000218767400005
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherTurkish Ophthalmological Socen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Oftalmoloji Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAssistant Of Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.subjectOptical Cohorence Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectVertical C/D Ratioen_US
dc.titleComparison of Vertical C/D Ratio Obtained by Assistant of Ophthalmology with Results of Optical Cohorence Tomographyen_US
dc.titleComparison of Vertical C/D Ratio Obtained by Assistant of Ophthalmology with Results of Optical Cohorence Tomography
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu