Can combined spinal-epidural analgesia be an alternative to epidural analgesia alone in labour?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÖlmez G.
dc.contributor.authorDa? I.H.
dc.contributor.authorÖzyilmaz M.A.
dc.contributor.authorYalinkaya A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:58:41Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:58:41Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractCurrently, the final point in labour analgesia has been accepted as combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSE). In this prospective and randomised study, we aimed to investigate whether this approach can be an alternative to epidural analgesia (EA) as a reference method. The study was performed with 50 primigravid pregnant women who planned to have vaginal delivery. The patients were allocated randomly to one of the two groups: In Group I, CSE block was applied in 25 patients and epidural block in Group II with 25 patients. A solution of 0.125% bupivacaine with 2 ?g mL-1 fentanyl was prepared for using in patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). Epidural catheters were introduced following the spinal administration of bupivacain (2.5 mg) plus fentanyl (25 ?g) in patients in Group1. PCEA was started after the VAS scores exceeded the level of 3. In Group 11, PCEA was started shortly after introducing of epidural catheters. Only with the first subarachnoidal dosage in GI sufficient analgesia was obtained in all patient. Duration of spinal analgesia was 89.80±9.94 min. At the fifth minute, VAS pain scores were significantly lower in CSE group than in EA group (p<0.0001). The amount of total bupivacaine consumption was 47.96±11.42 mg in GI and was 69.72±11.54 mg in GII (p<0.0001). These amounts for fentanyl consumption was 97.21±18.76 ?g in GI and 111.52±18.50 ?g in GII (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in the other variables. We conclude that CSEA technique can be an alternative approach in conditions of required fast analgesia and short term labour action in delayed deliveries and in multipartaous pregnants.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage72en_US
dc.identifier.issn1016-5150
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0037302259en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage66en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/24051
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyonen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCombined Spinal-Epidural Analgesiaen_US
dc.subjectEpidural Analgesiaen_US
dc.subjectLabouren_US
dc.subjectObstetric Analgesiaen_US
dc.titleCan combined spinal-epidural analgesia be an alternative to epidural analgesia alone in labour?en_US
dc.title.alternativeDo?um analjesinde kombine spinal-epidural yöntem epidural yönteme alternatif mi?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu