Microbiological evaluation of dental air-turbine handpieces after different disinfection procedures

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Zelal
dc.contributor.authorTacir, İbrahim
dc.contributor.authorDeğer, Yalçın
dc.contributor.authorÖzekinci, Tuncer
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:56:20Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:56:20Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractThe mouth is permanent source of microorganisms that can potentially transfer and cause infection in other people. The dental profession has traditional standards for cross-infection control, but the recent expression of real concerns by both the public and the profession over the transmissibility of infectious diseases in the dental office has demanded formalized teaching of cross-infection control in the dental curriculum. Disinfection is defined as the removal or killing of all pathogens, but not spores. Ideally, all vegetative microbes should be killed, but a reduction in the number of pathogens to a level that is unlikely to cause infection is acceptable. Methods of disinfection include heating (Pasteurization or boiling in water), ultrasonics, or chemical solutions. This study evaluated the microbiological effectiveness of different disinfectants used for dental aerator disinfection after clinical use. To evaluate the microbiological effectiveness of four different disinfectant sprays (Virkon®, Mikrozid® AF Liquid, Lysetol® AF, Maxispray®), 25 non-used aerators were selected. The in vitro antimicrobial activity against bacteria indicated that Virkon® and Lysetol AF® were more effective than the others. In addition, there was no bacterial growth after autoclave sterilization. Mikrozid AF® was not active against S. hominis; Maxispray® did not inactivate S. aureus and S. intermedius. S. aureus is probably a more frequent isolate from the oral cavity. A small proportion (5%) of the S. aureus isolates were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). There were insufficient data to determine whether the S. aureus isolates were colonizing or infecting the oral cavity. However, the role of S. aureus in several diseases of the oral mucosa merits further investigation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPolat, Z., Tacir, İ., Değer, Y. ve Özekinci, T. (2006). Microbiological evaluation of dental air-turbine handpieces after different disinfection procedures. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 20(2), 160-165.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13102818.2006.10817360
dc.identifier.endpage165en_US
dc.identifier.issn1310-2818
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33745781734en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage160en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2006.10817360
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/23459
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13102818.2006.10817360
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBiotechnology and Biotechnological Equipmenten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleMicrobiological evaluation of dental air-turbine handpieces after different disinfection proceduresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Microbiological Evaluation of Dental Air-Turbine Handpieces after Different Disinfection Procedures.pdf
Boyut:
747.62 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu