Evaluation of two different imaging software programs in planning orthognathic surgery cases

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-3876-5346en_US
dc.contributor.authorBalkı, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorDoğru, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-07T12:20:07Z
dc.date.available2022-12-07T12:20:07Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractAim: In this study, we aimed to compare the two-dimensional predictions made by two computer software packages with the postoperative values, and thus to evaluate the clinical reliability of digital orthognathic surgery planning. Methodology: Orthodontic treatment was performed before orthognathic surgery, and the same surgical team performed double-jaw orthognathic surgeries. We included 20 individuals (10 females, 10 males) with skeletal Class III malocclusion. The average age of the individuals was 21.5 years. In our study, the amount of movement was determined using reference lines on lateral cephalometric radiographs obtained from the preoperative and postoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) records of 20 individuals. Prediction profiles were formed using Dolphin Imaging (Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions, Chatsworth, CA, USA) and NemoFAB 2D (Software Nemotec, S.L, Spain) computer softwares. In this way, the reliability and consistency of two-dimensional prediction software were examined. Results: The prediction profiles obtained from the computer software were compared with lateral cephalometric radiographs of the postoperative surgery results for 37 cephalometric parameters. There were no significant differences between software predictions and postoperative results in any cephalometric parameters. Conclusion: The plans and predictions made with the two computer software packages were reliable and can be used clinicall.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBalkı, M. ve Doğru, M. (2022). Evaluation of two different imaging software programs in planning orthognathic surgery cases. International Dental Research, 12(2), 70-81.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5577/intdentres.2022.vol12.no2.5
dc.identifier.endpage81en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-1767
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage70en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1134190
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1134190
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/10970
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1134190
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.institutionauthorDoğru, Mehmet
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUluslararası Diş Araştırmaları Birliğien_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Dental Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPlanningen_US
dc.subjectOrthognathic surgeryen_US
dc.subjectClass III anomalyen_US
dc.subjectCBCTen_US
dc.subjectDolphin imagingen_US
dc.subjectNemoFABen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of two different imaging software programs in planning orthognathic surgery casesen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of two different imaging software programs in planning orthognathic surgery cases
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Evaluation of two different imaging software programs in planning.pdf
Boyut:
565.34 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu