Comparison of dentinal tubule penetration of three different root canal sealers by confocal laser scanning microscopy

dc.authorid0000-0002-4644-0058en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-3619-3118en_US
dc.contributor.authorGülmez, Hafize Kılıç
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Sadullah
dc.contributor.authorÖzata, Merve Yeniçeri
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-14T13:02:24Z
dc.date.available2023-08-14T13:02:24Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractAim: This study compared three different root canal sealers in terms of depth, area, and percentage of penetration into dentinal tubules. Methods: Sixty extracted human mandibular premolars were allocated into three groups, each containing twenty teeth, and filled with either AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, or Well Root ST root canal sealers, and gutta‑percha. Horizontal sections were taken at a distance of 1, 4, and 7 mm levels from the apical of the teeth and examined under a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Statistical analysis of the data involved running a Kruskal–Wallis‑H‑test. Results: There was no significant difference between the sealers in the apical and middle sections (P > 0.05). The penetration area and depth in the coronal section were the lowest in the MTA Fillapex compared to the AH Plus sealer (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the sections in terms of penetration percentage (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The sealers presented similar dentinal penetration area, depth, and percentage on the middle and apical sections. In the coronal section, the values were high within three parameters.en_US
dc.identifier.citationGülmez, H. K., Kaya, S. ve Özata, M. Y. (2023). Comparison of dentinal tubule penetration of three different root canal sealers by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Endodontology, 35(2), 107-112.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/endo.endo_41_22
dc.identifier.endpage112en_US
dc.identifier.issn0970-7212
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85164394008
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage107en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.lww.com/eddt/fulltext/2023/35020/comparison_of_dentinal_tubule_penetration_of_three.5.aspx
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/12476
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorGülmez, Hafize Kılıç
dc.institutionauthorKaya, Sadullah
dc.institutionauthorÖzata, Merve Yeniçeri
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluweren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEndodontology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAH plusen_US
dc.subjectConfocal laser scanning microscopyen_US
dc.subjectMineral trioxide aggregate fillapexen_US
dc.subjectSealer penetrationen_US
dc.subjectWell root STen_US
dc.titleComparison of dentinal tubule penetration of three different root canal sealers by confocal laser scanning microscopyen_US
dc.titleComparison of dentinal tubule penetration of three different root canal sealers by confocal laser scanning microscopy
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Comparison of dentinal tubule penetration of three different root canal sealers by confocal laser scanning microscopy.pdf
Boyut:
1.21 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: