Premedication for intrathecal anesthesia in dogs: Xylazine versus propofol

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYayla, Sadık
dc.contributor.authorKılıç, Engin
dc.contributor.authorÖǧün, Metin
dc.contributor.authorÇatalkaya, Emine
dc.contributor.authorErmutlu, Celal
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Uğur
dc.contributor.authorÖzaydın, İsa
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T17:58:12Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T17:58:12Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü, Veterinerlik Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to compare the effects of xylazine or propofol before intrathecal (IT) bupivacaine administration in dogs. The study was conducted in two groups of 10 dogs each. In group I (XG), intrathecal injection of 20 mg bupivacaine was administered into the subarachnoid space in the lumbosacral area after treatment with 1 mg/kg intravenous (iv) xylazine. In group II (PG), 4 mg/kg iv propofol was administered before IT bupivacaine administration. The onset, duration, and magnitude of sensory block (scale 0-3) were determined using the pin-prick test throughout the anesthesia. Duration of surgery (XG: 47.20 ± 5.01 min, PG: 50.85 ± 6.97 min) and duration of anesthesia (XG: 92.20 ± 7.02 min, PG: 94.50 ± 7.26 min) were not significantly different between the groups. This study concludes that propofol administration before IT anesthesia with bupivacaine maintains safe levels of IT anesthesia and can therefore be used as an alternative to xylazine treatment. © 2021 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.en_US
dc.identifier.citationYayla, S., Kılıç, E., Öǧün, M., Çatalkaya, E., Ermutlu, C., Aydın, U. ve diğerleri. (2020). Premedication for intrathecal anesthesia in dogs: Xylazine versus propofol. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology, 12(2), 44-49.
dc.identifier.doi10.22067/veterinary.v12i2.83153
dc.identifier.endpage49en_US
dc.identifier.issn2008-465X
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85102369265
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage44en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.22067/veterinary.v12i2.83153
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/23706
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFerdowsi University of Mashhaden_US
dc.relation.ispartofIranian Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBupivacaineen_US
dc.subjectDogen_US
dc.subjectIntrathecal Anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectPropofolen_US
dc.subjectXylazineen_US
dc.titlePremedication for intrathecal anesthesia in dogs: Xylazine versus propofolen_US
dc.titlePremedication for intrathecal anesthesia in dogs: Xylazine versus propofol
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
Premedication for intrathecal anesthesia in dogs Xylazine versus propofol.pdf
Boyut:
342.52 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu