Comparison of the efficacies of I-gelTM and LMA-ProSealTM for airway management in pediatric patients

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTokgöz, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorGüzel, Abdulmenap
dc.contributor.authorYüksel, Mustafa Uğur
dc.contributor.authorTüfek, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorAycan, İlker Öngüç
dc.contributor.authorÇelik, Feyzi
dc.contributor.authorBeyaz, Serbülent Gökhan
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T19:05:07Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T19:05:07Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The present study was performed to compare the performance of I-gelTM with LMA-ProSealTM in children undergoing anesthesia. Materials and methods: A total of 185 patients who were scheduled for elective surgery in Dicle University s hospital were randomly divided into 2 groups: the I-gelTM group (Group-I, n = 95) and the p-LMATM group (Group-P, n = 90). Airway leakage pressure, insertion time, fiberoptic laryngeal image scores, ease of insertion, and possible complications were compared between these groups. Results: The airway leakage pressure of Group-I was significantly higher than that of Group-P (means ± SD: 28 ± 5 vs. 20 ± 4 cmH2 O, P < 0.01). The duration of supraglottic airway device insertion was shorter in Group-I than Group-P (19 ± 4 vs. 28 ± 5 s, P < 0.01). The overall success rate was 95% for Group-I and 94% for Group-P (P = 0.10). The I-gel provided a better view of the glottis than the p-LMA (93% of cases in Group-I and 68% of cases in Group-P, P = 0.03). There were no significant differences with regard to ease of insertion (P = 0.97). Conclusion: This study suggested that I-gel is an effective and safe alternative supraglottic airway device for use in children.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage213en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0144
dc.identifier.issn1303-6165
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage208en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid211636
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/211636
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/27069
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Medical Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleComparison of the efficacies of I-gelTM and LMA-ProSealTM for airway management in pediatric patientsen_US
dc.titleComparison of the efficacies of I-gelTM and LMA-ProSealTM for airway management in pediatric patients
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu