Yazar "Turkyilmaz, Aysegul" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 8 / 8
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    AN AZOOSPERMIC CASE WITH Y ISOCHROMOSOME
    (John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2009) Turkyilmaz, Aysegul; Oral, Diclehan; Simsek, Selda; Isi, Hilmi
    [Abstract Not Available]
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    GENETIC ANALYSIS IN PREGNANCY WITH FETAL PATHOLOGIC ULTRASOUND FINDINGS
    (Diagnosis Press Ltd, 2013) Simsek, Selda; Turkyilmaz, Aysegul; Oral, Diclehan; Yalinkaya, Ahmet; Tekes, Selahaddin; Akbas, Halit; Budak, Turgay
    The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between fetal abnormal karyotype and fetal abnormal ultrasound examination in pregnancy A total of 191 women were analyzed for karyotyping after detection of a soft marker or of major malformations at the routine antenatal USG, for the period 2007-2011. A total of 191 amniotic fluid samples were analyzed for chromosome aberrations and the fetal karyotype was abnormal in 24.6 % (47/191) of all cases. Among them, 13 cases were with trisomy 21; 5 cases with trisomy 18; 1 case with trisomy 13; 2 cases with triploidy; 7 cases with karyotype of 45,X; 1 case with karyotype 47,XXY; and 18 cases with other abnormal chromosome structures. One hundred and fifty-two karyotyping procedures were done due to the finding of a single sonographic marker Within this group, 17.1 % of the karyotypes were abnormal. Thirty-nine karyotyping procedures were done due to the finding of a multiple sonographic marker In this group, 53.8 % of the karyotypes were abnormal. The overall termination rate was 61.7 % (29/47) in cases with a fetus affected by chromosomal abnormalities. Ultrasound examination is important in prenatal diagnosis. We suggest that karyotype analysis should be advised to pregnant women with an abnormal fetus in the ultrasound examination.
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSTIC RESULTS OF 241 CASES WITH HIGH RISK IN SCREENING TESTS
    (John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2009) Simsek, Selda; Turkyilmaz, Aysegul; Akbas, Halit; Tekes, Selahattin; Balkan, Mahmut; Budak, Turgay
    [Abstract Not Available]
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    A RARE CASE MOSAIC 16
    (John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2009) Turkyilmaz, Aysegul; Oral, Diclehan; Isi, Hilmi; Balkan, Mahmut
    [Abstract Not Available]
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    RECURRENT MISCARRIAGES IN A COUPLE WITH T(4,8) AND INV (9)
    (John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2009) Oral, Diclehan; Kalkanli-Tas, Sevgi; Fidanboy, Mehmet; Turkyilmaz, Aysegul; Budak, Turgay
    [Abstract Not Available]
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS OF THE FOLLICLE-STIMULATING HORMONE RECEPTOR GENE IN FERTILE AND INFERTILE MALES
    (John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2009) Balkan, Mahmut; Gedik, Abdullah; Tekes, Selahaddin; Simsek, Selda; Turkyilmaz, Aysegul; Oral, Diclehan; Budak, Turgay
    [Abstract Not Available]
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    TURNER- DOWN SYNDROME: A CASE REPORT
    (John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2009) Oral, Diclehan; Simsek, Selda; Turkyilmaz, Aysegul; Balkan, Mahmut
    [Abstract Not Available]
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Ultrasound findings in aneuploidy fetusus: Evaluation of 332 cases
    (Galenos Yayincilik, 2010) Yalinkaya, Ahmet; Guzel, Ali Irfan; Kangal, Kadir; Turkyilmaz, Aysegul; Savas, Zelal
    Objective: To evaluate the ultrasound findings found on ultrasound examination among cases that had aneuploidy at amniocentesis. Material and Methods: This prospective study was performed at Dicle University, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 332 cases applied to our department for prenatal diagnosis and amniocentesis (AC) was performed. Of these cases, twenty were found to have aneuploidy evaluated. The factors recorded were; mean age, gestational weeks, AC indications, ultrasound findings (by Toshiba 140A and GE Voluson 730 Pro 4D ultrasound device) and fetal anomalies. Results: 332 cases have had AC by an experienced specialist, in a two year period. The mean age of the cases was 32.20 +/- 6.03 years (22-44), and gestational weeks 16.45 +/- 1.46 (13-19). AC indications were; high double and/or triple test with ultrasound findings and abnormal ultrasound findings. In 8 (2.40%) cases there was no reproduction on cell culture. In 14 (4.21%) cases, different types of chromosomal anomalies were detected. In these cases, peripheral blood was taken from the parents and if, at least in one of them this situation was present, this would be accepted as normal. In 20 (6.02%) cases aneuploidy (numerical chromosomal anomalies) were detected and 11 of them (55.00%) were trisomy 21. In all of these aneuploidy cases, different types of ultrasound findings were detected; most of them had multiple ultrasound findings, and some of them had one anomaly. Of all 20 aneuploidy cases; termination of pregnancy was decided in 17 (85%) of them. 3 (15%) of these cases decided to carry on their pregnancy. Of the 3 cases; one baby was delivered spontaneously and live, one had died in utero and labor was induced and the third pregnancy is ongoing. Conclusion: The importance of ultrasound in fetal anomaly screening is incontrovertible and positive ultrasound findings are the most important indications of amniocentesis. For this reason, before amniocentesis, we advise a detailed ultrasound examination by an experienced specialist.