Yazar "Tufek, A." seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    The effect of propofol lipuro with and without lidocaine on injection pain in children
    (Medical & Dental Consultants Assoc Nigeria, 2011) Beyaz, S. Gokhan; Tufek, A.; Tokgoz, O.
    Objective: Despite advantages of propofol use such as providing a good anesthesia and rapid recovery; pain due to intravenous propofol injection continues to be a problem. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of generic propofol and propofol lipuro with and without lidocaine on injection pain in children. Materials and Methods: This study performed between 01 December 2009 and 16 May 2010. A total of 120 children, who planned to undergo elective surgery under general anesthesia, were included in four groups of 30 in a prospectively, randomized and double-blind study. Generic propofol was given to first and second groups and propofol lipuro was given to third and fourth groups. In addition to propofol, lidocaine was given to second and fourth groups. Injection pain was assessed using Ontario Children's Hospital Pain Scale (mCHEOPS). Results: No differences were found in the mean age, weight and given dose of propofol administered between all groups (P>0.05). Double comparison of groups revealed no significant difference in pain scores between Group 1 and 2 (mean pain scores, 1.34 +/- 1.42 vs. 1.22 +/- 1.31 points, respectively; P>0.05). However, significant difference was found between propofol lipuro groups with or without lidocaine (3.20 +/- 2.10 vs. 0.95 +/- 1.21 points, respectively; P<0.001). Conclusion: The highest pain scores were found in the propofol lipuro without lidocaine use while propofol lipuro plus lidocaine had the lowest pain scores. Because adding lidocaine to propofol lipuro decreased injection pain scores to minimum levels, this practice seems to be the most appropriate alternative in order to diminish propofol injection pain during anesthesia in children.
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    THE EFFECTS OF THYMOQUINONE TREATMENT AGAINST CARBON MONOXIDE INTOXICATION
    (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2016) Tokgoz, O.; Aycan, I. O.; Tufek, A.; Alabalik, U.; Evliyaoglu, O.; Yuksel, M. U.; Yildirim, Z. Baysal
    [Abstract Not Available]
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Unusual extraperitoneal rectal injuries: a retrospective study
    (Springer Heidelberg, 2012) Gumus, M.; Boyuk, A.; Kapan, M.; Onder, A.; Taskesen, F.; Aliosmanoglu, I.; Tufek, A.
    Rectal injuries, which are rarely encountered because of the anatomic characteristics, occur due to penetrating traumas. In the current study, we aimed to present experiences gleaned from our clinic concerning rarely encountered unusual rectal injuries, including those cases presented for the first time. Eleven patients who had been treated for unusual rectal injuries in the General Surgery Clinic of Dicle University between 2004 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. The reasons for rectal injuries included foreign bodies in four cases, sexual intercourse in three cases, iatrogenic injuries in two cases, electric shock in one case, and animal horns in one case. All cases had extraperitoneal rectal injuries and all injuries were grade 2 injuries, except for the electrical burn. Primary repair was adequate for the treatment of six patients. Four patients underwent primary repair and ostomy, whereas one of the patients underwent debridement and an ostomy. The patients recovered without complications, except for one patient with sphincter insufficiency. The results of the current study suggested that primary repair is adequate in the patients with low-energy injuries and early presentation, whereas an ostomy is required for those with late presentation and for those with high-energy and destructive injuries.