Yazar "Tanrikulu, A. C." seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Effects of treatment regimens on survival in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
    (Verduci Publisher, 2013) Abakay, A.; Abakay, O.; Tanrikulu, A. C.; Sezgi, C.; Sen, H.; Kaya, H.; Kucukoner, M.
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to investigate the factors affecting the survival of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) according to their treatment regimens, including best supportive care (BSC), chemotherapy, surgical group and multimodality (MM) therapy. PATIENTS: A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data and treatment outcomes of 400 patients registered in our hospital with MPM between January 1989 and April 2010. RESULTS: Mean age (p < 0.001), presence of asbestos exposure (p = 0.0014), presence of smoking history (p < 0.001), Karnofsky performance status (p < 0.001), histological subtype (p = 0.034) and stage (p < 0.001) variables were found to be significantly different among the four treatment regimens. Mean survival time of all patients was 12.32 months. Mean survival time 10.5 months for the BSC group, 15.7 for the surgical group, 16.02 for the chemotherapy group, and 26.55 for the MM group. There were significant differences in mean survival time among the four treatment regimens. In addition, a significant difference was found in survival time between the two chemotherapy groups (p = 0.032). Mean survival time for cisplatin + gemcitabine was found to be 14.49 months and for cisplatin + pemetrexed, 18.34 months. CONCLUSIONS: The MM group had better survival rates than the other groups. The new chemotherapy combination, cisplatin + pemetrexed, can be helpful in improving survival time.
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Prognostic factors influencing survival in 35 patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma
    (Aepress Sro, 2014) Kaya, H.; Sezgi, C.; Tanrikulu, A. C.; Taylan, M.; Abakay, O.; Sen, H. S.; Abakay, A.
    Malignant mesothelioma is a rare but highly lethal form of cancer that affects the serosal membranes. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is the second most common form of malignant mesothelioma (pleural mesothelioma is the most common). The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors influencing the survival of patients with MPM. A retrospective analysis was performed on 35 patients who were admitted to our hospital between March 2005 and July 2013. The patients' demographic and clinical data, laboratory results, radiological signs, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), and treatment outcomes were evaluated. The mean age of the 35 patients was 59.0 +/- 14.4 years, the mean survival time was 16.2 +/- 12.9 months, and the majority of the histopathological types of MPM were epithelial (68.6%). 82.9% of the patients had been exposed to asbestos, and the mean duration of exposure was 28.3 +/- 14.5 years. The most frequent symptoms were abdominal distention/pain, weight loss, dyspnea, and chest pain. The mean interval between the onset of symptoms and the diagnosis was 4.6 +/- 3.3 months. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy in combination with supportive care was used in the treatment of 68.6% of the patients, while supportive treatment alone was used in the others. Our results revealed that patients who were >60 years old (p=0.019), who were exposed to asbestos >20 years (p=0.033), who had an ECOG PS of 3 (p=0.000) were more likely to have a poor MPM prognosis. In conclusion, increased age, duration of environmental asbestos exposure and ECOG PS are important factors that influence the prognosis of MPM patients.
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Relationship between 18 FDG PET-CT findings and the survival of 177 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
    (Verduci Publisher, 2013) Abakay, A.; Komek, H.; Abakay, O.; Palanci, Y.; Ekici, F.; Tekbas, G.; Tanrikulu, A. C.
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a fatal malignancy. Radiological imaging is necessary for the diagnosis, staging, and clinical management of patients with MPM. The 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18 FDG-PET) scan has proven useful in preoperative staging and as a prognostic tool in MPM. We aimed to investigate the relationship between the pre-treatment 18 FDG PET/CT results, together with other known clinical parameters, and the survival of patients with MPM in our region. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the data of 177 patients with MPM between April 2007 and April 2011. Pretreatment 18 FDG PET/CT scans were done on all patients. Survival time was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The mean age was 55.40 years. There were 56% male patients and 44% female patients. The mean survival time was 11 months from time of diagnosis. According to multivariate analysis results, being of male gender increased the poor prognosis 5.30 times, a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) < 60 increased a poor prognosis 2.18 times, being on best supportive care increased a poor prognosis 25.40 times, the stage III-IV increased a poor prognosis 11.13 times, and a level of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) > 5 increased a poor prognosis 4.34 times. CONCLUSIONS: MPM remains a fatal prognosis. Significant predictors of survival include KPS, stage of disease, gender, treatment regimen and level of SUVmax. An understanding of the importance of these markers for MPM prognosis should allow targeted treatments to be developed.