Yazar "Ozdemir, N. Y." seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Mitomycin-C in combination with fluoropyrimidines in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after oxaliplatin and irinotecan failure(Zerbinis Medical Publ, 2011) Alkis, N.; Demirci, U.; Benekli, M.; Yilmaz, U.; Isikdogan, A.; Sevinc, A.; Ozdemir, N. Y.Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of mitomycin-C (MMC) in combination with fluoropyrimidines as salvage 3rd -or 4th-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients. Methods: All patients in this study had previously failed oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Patients were treated with MMC (6 mg/m(2) intravenously/i.v) on day 1 in combination with either oral UFT (500 mg/m(2)) and oral leucovorin (LV) (30 mg) on days 1-14 every 3 weeks (group A) or infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by deGramont regimen with i.v. LV (200 mg/m(2)) on days I and 2, every 2 weeks (group B). Results: Thirty-nine MCRC patients were analyzed. Twenty-two of them were in group A and 17 in group B. Thirty-three were evaluable for clinical efficacy The clinical benefit in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population was 30.8%. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 6 months (95% confidence interval/CI 4-8) and median overall survival (OS) 9 months (95% CI 6.5-11.5). Median PFS was 3 months (95% CI 2.4-3.6) in group A and 7 months (95% CI 5.1-8.9) in group B (p=0.009). Median OS was 7 months (95% CI 4.3-9.7) in group A and 12 months (95% CI 5.4-18.6) in group B (p=0.422). The combination of MMC and fluoropyrimidines was generally well tolerated. The most common severe toxicities were nausea and vomiting, neutropenia, hepatotoxicity and diarrhea. Conclusion: MMC in combination with fluoropyrimidines is safe and active in heavily-pretreated MCRC patients. This combination remains a viable option in these patients. However better therapies are urgently needed.Öğe Multiple primary malignant neoplasms: Multi-center results from Turkey(Imprimatur Publications, 2012) Babacan, N. A.; Aksoy, S.; Cetin, B.; Ozdemir, N. Y.; Benekli, M.; Uyeturk, U.; Kaplan, M. AliPurpose: Multiple primary malignant neoplasms (MPMNs) are defined as a diagnosis of two or more independent primary malignancies of different histologies/origins in an individual. The frequency of MPMN is being increasing. In this study we aimed to determine the frequency and clinical features of second primary cancers (SPCs). Methods: From January 1990 to December 2010, patients with MPMNs were screened in 5 centers. Data were obtained retrospectively from hospital charts. Results: Three hundred seventy-seven patients with MPMNs were evaluated. The median age at initial cancer diagnosis was 61 years (range 18-88). The median age at second cancer was 64 years (range 20-89). The median time between two cancer diagnoses was 15 months (range 0-504). Male to female ratio was 1.44 (M/F 223/154). The most frequent initial cancer types were head and neck (54 patients, 14.3%), breast (54 patients, 14.3%), and colorectal (43 patients, 11.4%). The most frequent second cancer types were lung (76 patients, 20.2%), colorectal (39 patients, 10.3%) and breast (33 patients, 8.8%). The most common cancer pairs in females were breast-gynecologic cancers (15 patients, 9.7%), colorectal-breast cancers (9 patients, 5.8%) and breast-colorectal cancers (7 patients, 4.5%). The most common cancer pairs in males were head and neck-lung cancers (29 patients, 13%), bladder-lung cancers (9 patients, 4%), and bladder-prostate cancers (7 patients, 3%). The median follow up was 36 months (range 1-595). Conclusion: Physicians should be aware of SPCs probabilities. Newly developed suspicious lesions should be evaluated rigorously. Histopathologic evaluations of suspicious lesions for second tumors should be used extensively if needed. In our series, the most common pairs were breast-gynecologic cancers in females and head and neck-lung cancers in males.