Yazar "Koca, Sinan" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 4 / 4
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Efficacy and tolerability of current treatments for hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients with visceral metastases(Future Medicine LTD., 2021) Oruç, Zeynep; Kaplan, M. Ali; Karaağac, Mustafa; Özyurt, Neslihan; Tatlı, Ali Murat; Kaya, Ali Osman; Menekşe, Serkan; Kut, Engin; Koca, Sinan; Sever, Özlem Nuray; Yasin, İrem; Ebinç, Senar; Zeynelgil, Esra; Sakin, Abdullah; Turhal, Nazım Serdar; Işıkdoğan, AbdurrahmanAim: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of the first-line treatment options for hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients with visceral metastases. Materials and methods: The records of 191 patients diagnosed with hormone-refractory prostate cancer with visceral metastases were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Docetaxel was administered to 61.2% (n = 117), abiraterone to 14.2% (n = 27) and enzalutamide to 9.4% (n = 18) as the first-line treatment. The median survival of the patients receiving docetaxel, abiraterone and enzalutamide as the first-line treatment during the hormone-refractory period was 15 (95% Cl: 12.9-17) months, 6 (95% Cl: 1.8-10.1) months and 11 (95% Cl: 0.9-23.1) months (p = 0.038), respectively. Conclusion: The present study established a statistically significant difference in favor of docetaxel in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival. Lay abstract The optimal therapeutic option for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients with visceral metastases is unknown. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of the first-line treatment options for CRPC patients with visceral metastasis. One hundred ninety-one patients diagnosed with CRPC with visceral metastases were included in the study. The present study established a statistically significant difference in favor of docetaxel in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival between first-line docetaxel, abiraterone and enzalutamide treatments in CRPC patients with visceral metastases. For patients who cannot undergo chemotherapy, enzalutamide, among novel androgen pathway inhibitors, may be the most appropriate option, given its numerical, although statistically insignificant, difference in overall survival and its fewer side effects compared with abiraterone.Öğe Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma: A multicenter retrospective study(Sage Publications Ltd, 2021) Koca, Sinan; Besiroglu, Mehmet; Ozcelik, Melike; Karaca, Mustafa; Bilici, Mehmet; Hacioglu, Bekir; Dogu, Gamze G.Purpose Soft tissue sarcomas are associated with a poor prognosis and low chemotherapeutic efficiency. Pazopanib is an orally available multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor that was explored in patients with non-adipocytic advanced soft tissue sarcomas. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the real life data of single-agent pazopanib efficacy and safety for soft tissue sarcomas in the Turkish population. Materials and methods We evaluated a total of 103 patients (41 males, 62 females) who received pazopanib for advanced non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcomas diagnosis in eight centers of Turkey, retrospectively. The pazopanib dose was 800 mg once daily. Progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events were analyzed. Results The median age was 50 years (range, 38-58). Majority of the patients had leimyosarcoma (41%). Median progression-free survival was 4.3 months, and the median overall survival was 10.1 months. The main common toxicities were fatigue, anorexia, weight loss, nausea, hypertension, and grade >= 3 toxicities were fatigue, anorexia, weight loss, and liver disorder. Conclusion Pazopanib is an efficient and tolerable agent and is well tolerated in good performance status patients with relapsed, advanced non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcomas.Öğe Real-world outcomes of pazopanib in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective Turkish oncology group (TOG) study(Springer Science and Business Media, 2023) Bilici, Ahmet; Koca, Sinan; Karaaǧaç, Mustafa; Aydın, Sabin Göktaş; Eraslan, Emrah; Kaplan, Muhammed AliAim: Description of patient characteristics, effectiveness and safety in Turkish patients treated with pazopanib for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Patients and methods: This multicenter study is based on retrospective review of hospital medical records of patients (≥ 18 years) treated with pazopanib for non-adipocytic metastatic STS at 37 Oncology clinics across Turkey. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated with further analysis of data on the three most common histological subtypes (leiomyosarcoma [LMS], undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma [UPS], synovial sarcoma [SS]) in the cohort. Results: Data of 552 adults (57.6% women, median age: 52 years) were analyzed. DCR and ORR were 43.1% and 30.8%, respectively. Median PFS was 6.7 months and OS was 13.8 months. For LMS, UPS and SS, median PFSs were 6.1, 5.9 and 7.53 months and median OSs were 15.03, 12.87 and 12.27 months, respectively. ECOG ≥ 2 was associated with poor PFS and OS. Liver metastasis was only a factor for progression. Second-line use of pazopanib (vs. front-line) was associated with better PFS, its use beyond third line predicted worse OS. Adverse events (AE) occurred in 82.7% of patients. Most common AEs were fatigue (58.3%) and anorexia (52.3%) which were graded as ≥ 3 in 8.2% and 7.4% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: Pazopanib is effective and well-tolerated in treatment of non-adipocytic metastatic STS. Its earlier use (at second-line), good performance status may result in better outcomes. Worldwide scientific collaborations are important to gain knowledge on rarer STS subtypes by conducting studies in larger patient populations.Öğe Where should enzalutamide be in the metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): A multi-center study(Kare Publishing, 2023) Koca, Sinan; Ökten, İlker Nihat; Beşiroğlu, Mehmet; Telli, Tuğba Akın; Demirci, Ayşe; Karaağaç, Mustafa; Oruç, ZeynepObjectives: Enzalutamide(ENZ) is an effective hormonal treatment modality in mCRPC. It can be used before or after docetaxel(DTX) in this setting. Herein, we aimed to show the efficacy of ENZ before or after DTX use and the factors predicting the efficacy. Methods: We retrospectively collected the data of 320 patients from 12 centers who were treated with ENZ in mCRPC. The initial stage, age, line of treatment, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels before ENZ treatment and at nadir, site of metastasis, gleason score were evaluated. Results: Median age of 320 patients were 69. At a median follow-up of 56 months, 271/320 (84.7%) disease progression and 230/320(71.9%) death had been observed. Median PFS was 11(8.9-13)) and median OS was 25(22.1-27.8) months in all patients group. Median PFS was 10(7.4-12.5) months, 11(8-13.9) months in pre-DTX and post-DTX groups respectively. Median OS was higher in the post-DTX group than the pre-DTX group (28(25.7-30.2) vs 19(15.0-22.9-46.6) (p:0.000). Gleason score≥8 (HR 0.59, 95%CI 0.46-0.77, p=0.00), presence of non-visceral metastasis (HR 0.72, 95%CI 0.53-0.97, p=0.031), initial PSA value<43(median) (HR 0.70, 95%CI 0.54-0.91, p=0.009), PSA at nadir <2 (HR 0.61, 95%CI 0.44-0.85, p=0.004), >50% decline in PSA (HR 0.27, 95%CI 0.19-0.36, p=0.000) significantly predicted ENZ response regarding rPFS. Conclusion: ENZ has shown equal efficacy before and after DTX treatment in mCRPC regarding rPFS. But OS rate was significantly better in the pre-DTX group. Therefore, we recommend starting with DTX in patients who can tolerate chemotherapy in mCRPC setting.
