Yazar "Duru, Serap" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Attitude and practice toward use of cigarettes and electronic cigarettes among pregnant women: A questionnaire-based survey(Aves Yayıncılık, 2022) Yıldırım, Elif; Duru, Serap; Sevim, Tülin; Topçu, Füsun; Gemicioğlu, Bilun; Özmen, İpek; Ocaklı, BirsenOBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate attitude and practice toward use of regular tobacco cigarettes and electronic cigarettes among pregnant women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 1123 pregnant women participated on a voluntary basis in this questionnaire survey. Maternal characteristics, cigarette consumption parameters, and personal opinions regarding the adverse effects of smoking during pregnancy were evaluated. RESULTS: Active smokers composed 12.4% (9.4%: regular tobacco cigarettes, 3.0%: electronic cigarettes) of the study population. Smoking during the current pregnancy, particularly via regular tobacco cigarettes, was more likely for women with smoking during previous pregnancies (56.0% vs. 7.8%, P < .001), previous history of low birth weight infant delivery (16.1% vs. 8.6%, P = .013), premature delivery (16.7% vs. 7.0%, P < .001), and stillbirth (22.8% vs. 11.7%, P = .002). The presence versus absence of smoking during pregnancy was associated with a lower likelihood of being a housewife (70.5% vs. 80.5%, P = .010) and a higher likelihood of having an actively smoking mother (25.9% vs. 11.2%, P < .001) or partner (65.7% vs. 46.9%, P < .001). Regular tobacco cigarette users considered electronic cigarettes to have a higher risk of adverse impacts (11.1% vs. 2.9%, P = .012), while electronic cigarette users considered regular cigarettes to have a higher risk of nicotine exposure (55.9% vs. 13.0%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate being employed, having an actively smoking mother or partner, as well as smoking in previous pregnancies, to be the risk factors for increased likelihood of smoking during pregnancy.Öğe Electronic Smoking In Parents In Pregnancy; A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study(European Respiratory Soc Journals Ltd, 2018) Yildirim, Elif Ozari; Duru, Serap; Sevim, Tulin; Topcu, Fusun; Gemicioglu, Bilun; Ozmen, Ipek; Ocakli, Birsen[Abstract Not Available]Öğe Evaluation of patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease: Preliminary results from the Turk-UIP study(Aves, 2021) Musellim, Benan; Moğulkoç, Nesrin; Uzun, Oğuz; Akyıl, Fatma Tokgöz; Türktaş, Haluk; Kumbasar, Özlem Özdemir; Okumuş, Gülfer; Oğuş, Candan; Dirol, Hülya; Zamani, Adil; Sevim, Tülin; Annakkaya Ali Nihat; Özyurek, Berna Akıncı; Hanta, İsmail; Aydemir, Yusuf; Edis, Ebru Çakır; Kurt, Bahar; Tertemiz, Kemal Can; Tabak, Levent; Yazıcı, Onur; Erdoğan, Yurdanur; Ateş, Güngör; Türker, Hatice; Salepçi, Banu; Hazar, Armağan; Niksarlıoğu Elif Yelda; Kara, Bilge Yılmaz; Köktürk, Nurdan; Kalpaklıoğlu, Füsun; Uzel, Işıl; Özsu, Savaş; Atahan, Ersan; Fendoğlu, Türkan Zeynep; Süreyya, Yılmaz; Başyiğit, İlknur; Çamsarı, Güngör; Tuncay, Esin; Yılmazel, Elif Uçar; Kanmaz, Dilek; Ekici, Aydanur; Topçu, Füsun; Uzaslan, Esra; Bozkuş, Fülsen; Barış, Serap Argun; Duru, Serap; Altınışık, Göksel; Bingöl, Züleyha; Tunacı, Atadan; Savaş, Recep; Alper, Fatih; Bayraktaroğlu, Selen; Can, Tuba Selçuk; Demir, Ali ArslanOBJECTIVE: Differential diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is important among fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILD). This study aimed to evaluate the rate of IPF in patients with fibrotic ILD and to determine the clinical-laboratory features of patients with and without IPF that would provide the differential diagnosis of IPF. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included the patients with the usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern or possible UIP pattern on thorax high-resolution computed tomography, and/or UIP pattern, probable UIP or possible UIP pattern at lung biopsy according to the 2011 ATS/ERSARS/ALAT guidelines. Demographics and clinical and radiological data of the patients were recorded. All data recorded by researchers was evaluated by radiology and the clinical decision board. RESULTS: A total of 336 patients (253 men, 83 women, age 65.8 +/- 9.0 years) were evaluated. Of the patients with sufficient data for diag-nosis (n=300), the diagnosis was IPF in 121 (40.3%), unclassified idiopathic interstitial pneumonia in 50 (16.7%), combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) in 40 (13.3%), and lung involvement of connective tissue disease (CTD) in 16 (5.3%). When 29 patients with definite IPF features were added to the patients with CPFE, the total number of IPF patients reached 150 (50%). Rate of male sex (p<0.001), smoking history (p<0.001), and the presence of clubbing (p=0.001) were significantly high in patients with IPE None of the women <50 years and none of the men <50 years of age without a smoking history were diagnosed with IPE Presence of at least 1 of the symptoms suggestive of CTD, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and antinuclear antibody (FANA) positivity rates were significantly higher in the non-IPF group (p<0.001, p=0.029, p=0.009, respectively). CONCLUSION: The rate of IPF among patients with fibrotic ILD was 50%. In the differential diagnosis of IPF, sex, smoking habits, and the presence of clubbing are important. The presence of symptoms related to CTD, ESR elevation, and EANA positivity reduce the likelihood of IPF.