Yazar "Berk, Veli" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 17 / 17
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Bevacizumab every 4 weeks is as effective as every 2 weeks in combination with biweekly FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer(Springer, 2012) Yildiz, Ramazan; Benekli, Mustafa; Ozkan, Metin; Alkis, Necati; Berk, Veli; Kaplan, Mehmet Ali; Ciltas, AydinThe efficacy and tolerability of bevacizumab every 2 or 4 weeks using the same dosage in combination with biweekly FOLFIRI were retrospectively evaluated in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients in the first-line and second-line therapy. A total of 332 patients from six centers were evaluated. The patients had received biweekly FOLFIRI in combination with bevacizumab 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks schedule for various reasons in individual patients. Approximately 70 % of all patients had 2-week treatment schedule. In the first-line therapy (n = 240), the overall response rate (ORR) was 34.1 % in 2-week and 36.3 % in 4-week groups. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 months (95 %CI, 6.8-9.2) and 9 months (95 %CI, 6.6-11.4) (p = 0.074), and median overall survival (OS) was 22 months (95 %CI, 15.8-28.2) and 20 months (95 %CI, 8.1-31.9) (p = 0.612) in 2- and 4-week groups, respectively. One-year survival rate was 76.2 % for 2-week group and 73.2 % for 4-week group. In the second-line therapy (n = 92), the ORR was similar between the groups (24.5 vs 25.9 % in 2- and 4-week groups, respectively). Median PFS was 6 months (95 %CI, 4.7-7.3) and 11 months (95 %CI, 6.3-15.7) (p = 0.074), and median OS was 15 months (95 %CI, 9.6-20.4) and 17 months (95 %CI, 13.7-20.3) (p = 0.456) for 2-week and for 4-week groups, respectively. One-year survival rate was 61.3 % for 2-week and 71.3 % for 4-week groups. Toxicity profile was similar in 2- and 4-week groups and included neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, mucositis, bleeding, hypertension, thromboembolism and fistulization. Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks in combination with biweekly FOLFIRI had similar efficacy and tolerability in mCRC. Because of the retrospective nature of our study, the data should be examined cautiously. However, our study clearly points out the need for determination of optimum biological dosing interval of bevacizumab in well-designed, prospective, randomized trials.Öğe Bevacizumab-containing Chemotherapy is Safe in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and a Synchronous Asymptomatic Primary Tumor(Oxford Univ Press, 2013) Cetin, Bulent; Kaplan, Mehmet Ali; Berk, Veli; Tufan, Gulnihal; Benekli, Mustafa; Isikdogan, Abdurrahman; Ozkan, MetinSurgical resection of asymptomatic primary colorectal cancer in patients presenting with synchronous unresectable metastatic disease is controversial. Concerns and controversies remain over combining cytotoxic chemotherapy with bevacizumab in this patient population. We identified medical records of 99 patients with synchronous metastatic primary colorectal cancer who received chemotherapy with bevacizumab as their initial treatment. The incidence of subsequent use of surgery and surgical outcomes were recorded. Patients were also assessed for overall survival. Patients who received bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy for synchronous metastatic primary colorectal cancer were divided into the non-surgery and surgery groups according to the resection status of their asymptomatic primary tumor. In the non-surgery group, two patients (4.4) underwent additional surgery, while three patients (5.7) required surgery for rectovesical fistula in the surgery group. The median overall survival was 17 months for the non-surgery group (95 CI: 10.623.3 months) and 23 months for the surgery group (95 CI: 21.324.6 months; P 0.322). This study utilizing chemotherapy with bevacizumab did not result in an increased rate of morbidity related to the unresected primary tumor. Survival is not compromised by leaving the primary colon tumor intact.Öğe Clinicopathological Features in Bilateral Breast Cancer(Asian Pacific Organization Cancer Prevention, 2012) Baykara, Meltem; Ozturk, Selcuk Cemil; Buyukberber, Suleyman; Helvaci, Kaan; Ozdemir, Nuriye; Alkis, Necati; Berk, VeliIntroduction and Purpose: The frequency of bilateral breast cancer is 1.4-11.0% among all breast cancers. It can present as synchronous (SC) or metachronous (MC). Data regarding clinical course of bilateral breast cancer are scarce. In this study, we therefore evaluated demographic, pathological and clinical characteristics, treatments and responses in bilateral breast cancer cases; making distinctions between metachronous-synchronous and comparing with historic one-sided data for the same parameters. Materials and Methods: One hundred fifty bilateral breast cancer cases from ten different centers between 2000 and 2011 were retrospectively scanned. Age of the cases, family history, menopausal status, pathological features, pathological stages, neoadjuvant, surgery, adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy/radiotherapy were examined in the context of the first and second occurrence and discussed with reference to the literature. Results: Metachronous and synchronous groups showed similar age, menopausal status, tumor type, HER2/neu expression; the family history tumor grade, tumor stage, ER-negativity rate, local and distant metastases rates, surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy application rates were identified as significantly different. Palliative chemotherapy response rate was greater in the metachronous group but median PFS rates did not differ between the groups. Conclusion: Although bilateral breast cancer is not frequent, MC breast cancer is different from SC breast cancer by having more advanced grade, stage, less ER expression, more frequent rates of local relapse and distant metastasis and better response to chemotherapy in case of relapse/metastasis.Öğe Efficacy and safety results of pemetrexed administration in non-small cell lung cancers, a multicenter study of the Association of Anatolian Medical Oncology.(Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013) Yasar, Nurgul; Unal, Olcun Umit; Geredeli, Caglayan; Inal, Ali; Berk, Veli; Sari, Ebru; Durnali, Ayse[Abstract Not Available]Öğe Efficiency and Side Effects of Sorafenib Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study by the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology(Asian Pacific Organization Cancer Prevention, 2013) Berk, Veli; Kaplan, Mehmet Ali; Tonyali, Onder; Buyukberber, Suleyman; Balakan, Ozan; Ozkan, Metin; Demirci, UmutBackground: Inoperable and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with a poor prognosis and low chemotherapeutic efficiency. Sorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor exerting its effects via the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and platelet derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFR-beta) tyrosine kinases. Randomized studies have shown a significant contribution of sorafenib to life expectancy and quality of life of cancer patients. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of sorafenib therapy in Turkey. Materials and Methods: Data for 103 patients (82 males, 21 females) receiving sorafenib therapy in 13 centers from February 2008 to December 2012 were evaluated. Median age was 61 years and median ECOG performance status was 1 (range: 0-2). 60 patients (58%) had hepatitis B, 15 patients (15%) had hepatitis C infection and 12 patients (12%) had a history of alcohol consumption. All of the patients had Child scores meeting the utilization permit of the drug in our country (Child A). Results: A total of 571 cycles of sorafenib therapy were administered with a median of four per patient. Among the evaluable cases, there was partial response in 15 (15%), stable disease in 52 (50%), and progressive disease in 36 (35%). Median progression-free survival was 18 weeks and median overall survival was 48 weeks. The dose was reduced only in 6 patients and discontinued in 2 patients due to grade 3-4 toxicity, 18 patients (17%) suffering hand-foot syndrome, 7 (7%) diarrhea, and 2 (2%) vomiting. Conclusions: This retrospective study demonstrated better efficacy of sorafenib therapy in patients with advanced HCC compared to the literature while progression-free survival and overall survival findings were comparable. The side effect rates indicate that the drug was tolerated well. In conclusion, among the available treatment options, sorafenib is an efficient and tolerable agent in patients with inoperable or metastatic HCC.Öğe Gemcitabine Plus Paclitaxel as Second-line Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer(Asian Pacific Organization Cancer Prevention, 2012) Baykara, Meltem; Coskun, Ugur; Berk, Veli; Ozkan, Metin; Kaplan, Muhammet Ali; Benekli, Mustafa; Karaca, HalitPurpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity of gemcitabine and paclitaxel combinations with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) who have progressive disease after platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the file records of patients treated with gemcitabine plus paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic NSCLC cases in a second-line setting. The chemotherapy schedule was as follows: gemcitabine 1500 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) administered every two weeks. Results: Forty-eight patients (45 male, 3 female) were evaluated; stage IIIB/IV 6/42; PS0, 8.3%, PS1, 72.9%, PS2, 18.8%; median age, 56 years old (range 38-76). Six (12.5%) patients showed a partial response (PR), 13 (27.1%) stable disease (SD), and 27 (56.3%) progressive disease (PD). The median OS was 6.63 months (95% CI 4.0-9.2); the median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI 1.8-3.6). Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities, including neutropenia (n=4, 8.4%), and anemia (n=3, 6.3%) were encountered, but no grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. One patient developed febrile neutropenia. There were no interruption for reasons of toxicity and no exitus related to therapy. Conclusion: The combination of two-weekly gemcitabine plus paclitaxel was an effective and well-tolerated second-line chemotherapy regimen for advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy. Although the most common and dose limiting toxicities were neutropenia and neuropathy, this regimen was tolerated well by the patients.Öğe Is Late Recurrence a Predictive Clinical Marker for Better Sunitinib Response in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients?(Cig Media Group, Lp, 2015) Bozkurt, Oktay; Hacibekiroglu, Ilhan; Kaplan, Muhammet Ali; Duzkopru, Yakup; Uysal, Mukremin; Karaca, Halit; Berk, VeliAlthough there has been an increase in overall and progression-free survival with the use of novel targeted therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in recent times, predictive markers to determine which patients would benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies are needed. The late recurrence might be a predictive marker for response to sunitinib treatment in patients with mRCC. Background: We investigated the clinicopathological features in patients with recurrent renal cell carcinoma (RCC) within 5 years or more than 5 years after nephrectomy and determined predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after disease recurrence in the administration of first-line sunitinib in the treatment of metastatic RCC (mRCC). Patients and Methods: In this study we enrolled 86 Turkish patients with mRCC who received sunitinib. Univariate analyses were performed using the log rank test. Results: Fifty-six patients (65%) were diagnosed with disease recurrence within 5 years after radical nephrectomy (early recurrence) and 30 patients (35%) were diagnosed with recurrence more than 5 years after radical nephrectomy (late recurrence). Fuhrman grade was statistically significantly different between the 2 groups (P = .013). The late recurrence patients were significantly associated with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center favorable risk group compared with patients with early recurrence (p = .001). There was a statistically significant correlation between recurrence time and the rate of objective remission (ORR) (the late recurrence group vs. the early recurrence group: 43.3% vs. 14.3%, respectively; P = .004). From the time of disease recurrence, the median OS was 42.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.4-59.5) months in the late recurrence group, and 16 (95% CI, 11.5-20.4) months in the early recurrence group (P = .001). Median PFS was 8(95% CI, 4.05-11.9) months in the early recurrence group, and 20 (95% CI, 14.8-25.1) months in the late recurrence group (P <= .001). Conclusion: The study demonstrated a potential prognostic value of late recurrence in terms of PFS, OS, and ORR. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Öğe Is sunitinib-induced hypothyroidism a predictive clinical marker for better response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients?(Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2016) Bozkurt, Oktay; Karaca, Halit; Hacibekiroglu, Ilhan; Kaplan, Muhammed Ali; Duzkopru, Yakup; Uysal, Mukremin; Berk, VeliBackground: The main goal of this study was to examine whether the occurrence of hypothyroidism during sunitinib therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is associated with a better outcome. Methods: The study enrolled 81 patients with pathologically proven mRCC who were treated with sunitinib between March 2008 and June 2013. Thyroid function evaluation comprised (free-thyroxine) FT4 and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) before treatment and at day 1 of each 6-week cycle. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences among the groups were determined using the log-rank test. Results: Hypothyroidism occurred in 30 (37%) of 81 patients within a median 3 months (range 1-18) of treatment initiation. There was a statistically significant correlation between the occurrence of hypothyroidism during treatment and the rate of objective remission (ORR) (hypothyroid patients vs euthyroid patients: 46.7 vs 13.7%, respectively; P = 0.001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10 (95% CI 6.13-13.8) months in the euthyroid patients, and 17 (95% CI 9.33-24.6) months in the hypothyroid patients (P = 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) was 39 (95% CI 25.4-52.5) months in the hypothyroid patients and 20 (95% CI 14.7-25.2) months in the euthyroid patients (P = 0.019). Conclusions: The occurrence of hypothyroidism during treatment in patients was significantly associated with longer PFS, OS and better ORR in the current study.Öğe Is the Pretreatment Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio an Important Prognostic Parameter in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma?(Cig Media Group, Lp, 2013) Cetin, Bulent; Berk, Veli; Kaplan, Mehmet Ali; Afsar, Baris; Tufan, Gulnihal; Ozkan, Metin; Isikdogan, AbdurahmanIn this study, we have undertaken a retrospective review of 100 patient charts to investigate whether neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with second-line vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) after failure of interferon-alpha. We have shown that NLR at diagnosis is an independent predictor of survival in mRCC patients. Investigation of therapies which harness the immune response are warranted in this disease. Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor is a standard treatment for mRCC. The NLR, an index of systemic inflammation, is associated with outcome in several cancer types. To study the association of pretreatment NLR with PFS and overall survival (OS) of patients treated with VEGF-targeted therapy. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively studied an unselected cohort of patients with mRCC, who were treated with TKIs. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were employed on PFS and OS and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model analyzed clinical parameters for their prognostic relevance. Results: A total of 100 patients with mRCC who had early progressed after first-line therapy with interferon-alpha were included in this retrospective multicenter study conducted at 4 centers between February 2008 and December 2011. The median of the NLR was 3.04 and patients were divided into 2 higher and lower NLR groups according to median of NLR. Median PFS was 9 versus 11 months in patients with baseline NLR > 3.04 versus <= 3.04 (P = .009). The median OS was 16 months versus 29 months, in patients with NLR > 3.04 versus <= 3.04, respectively (P = .004). In the whole group OS was independently associated with higher NLR (hazard ratio [HR], 2.406; P = .004), PFS more than 6 months (HR, 4.081; P = .0001), and sex (HR, 2.342; P = .040). On the other hand in the higher NLR group (HR, 1.107; P = .009) Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center score (HR, 3.398; P = .0001) was associated with PFS. Conclusion: In patients with mRCC treated with VEGF-targeted therapy, pretreatment NLR, the duration of PFS might be associated with OS. This should be investigated prospectively. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Öğe Lack of Prognostic Value of Mean Corpuscular Volume with Capecitabine Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer(Asian Pacific Organization Cancer Prevention, 2014) Bozkurt, Oktay; Berk, Veli; Kaplan, Muhammed Ali; Cetin, Bulent; Ozaslan, Ersin; Karaca, Halit; Inanc, MevludeCapecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative which is frequently used alone or in combination regimens for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Although overall and progression free survivals have increased in recent years with the use of new generation drugs, predictive factors that would further improve the outcomes are needed. Previous studies have demonstrated the relation between post-treatment increase in mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and predicting therapy response as well as survival. The present study investigated the clinical impact of MCV elevation in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with capecitabine. Materials and Methods: The data of a total of 82 patients from three centers followed between June 2005 and June 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The demographic data and hormone receptor status of the patients, as well as initial examination before and after treatment and data concerning progression were recorded. MCV >= 100 fl was considered as macrocytosis. Capecitabine was given at a dose of 2500 mg/m(2) daily for 14 days every three weeks. Pre-treatment and post-treatment MCV and other parameters of complete blood count were recorded. Post-treatment initial evaluation was performed after 2 cycles of therapy. Results: The median age of the patients was 46.5 years (range 26-72 years) and 54% were premenopausal. Performance status was ECOG 0 and 1 in 81 (99%) patients. The median number of cycles for capecitabine therapy was 5 (min-max: 2-18). The median Delta MCV level (post-treatment values at sixth week - baseline) was 6.4. Whilst Delta MCV was >= 6.4 in 42 patients, it was <6.4 in 40 patients. Clinical benefit (complete response+partial response+stable disease) was observed in 37 (88%) of 42 patients with a median Delta MCV >= 6.4 and in 30 (75%) of 40 patients with Delta MCV <6.4 with no statistically significant difference (p=0.158). No significant difference was determined between the group with Delta MCV >= 6.4 and the group with Delta MCV <6.4 in terms of progression-free survival (11 vs 12 months) (p=0.55) and overall survival (20 months vs. 24 months) (p=0.11). Conclusions: The identification of new predictive markers in metastatic breast cancer is very important. In some recent studies, increase in MCV has been suggested as a marker in tumor response. In the present study, however, no significant difference was determined between tumor response and increase in MCV. Further studies including higher numbers of patients are needed to determine whether increase in MCV is a predictive marker or not.Öğe Long Term Survivors with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Gemcitabine Alone or Plus Cisplatin: a Retrospective Analysis of an Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology Multicenter Study(Asian Pacific Organization Cancer Prevention, 2012) Inal, Ali; Ciltas, Aydin; Yildiz, Ramazan; Berk, Veli; Kos, F. Tugba; Dane, Faysal; Unek, Ilkay TugbaBackground: The majority of patients with pancreatic cancer present with advanced disease. Systemic chemotherapy has limited impact on overall survival (OS) so that eligible patients should be selected carefully. The aim of this study was to analyze prognostic factors for survival in Turkish advanced pancreatic cancer patients who survived more than one year from the diagnosis of recurrent and/or metastatic disease and receiving gemcitabine (Gem) alone or gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis). Methods: This retrospective evaluation was performed for patients who survived more than one year from the diagnosis of recurrent and/or metastatic disease and who received gemcitabine between December 2005 and August 2011. Twenty-seven potential prognostic variables were chosen for univariate and multivariate analyses to identify prognostic factors associated with survival. Results: Among the 27 variables in univariate analysis, three were identified to have prognostic significance: sex (p = 0.04), peritoneal dissemination (p = 0.02) and serum creatinine level (p = 0.05). Multivariate analysis by Cox proportional hazard model showed only peritoneal dissemination to be an independent prognostic factor for survival. Conclusion: In conclusion, peritoneal metastasis was identified as an important prognostic factor in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients who survived more than one year from the diagnosis of recurrent and/or metastatic disease and receiving Gem or GemCis. The findings should facilitate pretreatment prediction of survival and can be used for selecting patients for treatment.Öğe Outcome of 561 non-metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients: Multi-center experience from Turkey(Imprimatur Publications, 2014) Budakoglu, Burcin; Altundag, Kadri; Aksoy, Sercan; Kaplan, Muhammed A.; Ozdemir, Nuriye Y.; Berk, Veli; Ozkan, MetinPurpose: Triple-negative breast cancers account for 15% of breast carcinomas and, when present as early-stage disease, they are associated with higher rates of recurrence and early distant metastasis risk when compared to hormone receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER-2) positive breast cancers. In this study we aimed to explore the basic clinicopathological characteristics, prognostic factors and recurrence patterns of non-metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients. Methods: In this study 561 non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer female patients admitted to 8 different cancer centers in Turkey between 2000 and 2010 were retrospectively evaluated through their medical records, to identify the basic clinico-pathological characteristics, prognostic factors and recurrence patterns. Results: The ratio of triple-negative breast cancer was 12%. The median age of patients was 48 years, of whom 311 (55.4%) were premenopausal. The majority had early-stage breast cancer at the time of diagnosis (16.8% stage I, 48.1% stage II, 35.1 % stage III) and the most commonly identified variant was invasive ductal carcinoma (84.1%). Grade II and III tumors were 27.1 and 48.5%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 90.5% of women and adjuvant radiotherapy to 41.2%. Median patient follow up was 28 months (range 3-290). During the follow up period 134 (23.8%) patients developed metastatic disease. In most of these cases, metastatic sites were bone, soft tissue, and lung. Factors affecting disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were age (both p<0.001), lymph node involvement (both p<0.001), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (p<0.001 and p=0.004, respectively), tumor stage (both p<0.001), adjuvant administration of anthracycline-based chemotherapy (both <0.001) and type of surgery (not significant for DFS but p=0.05 for OS). Three-year DFS and OS were 72.0 and 93.0%, respectively. Conclusion: Age, lymph node involvement, LVI, stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy were determined as prognostic factors for DFS and OS. The most common recurrence sites were bone, soft tissue and the lung. Further prospective randomised trials are needed to confirm the prognostic and predictive factors identified in this study.Öğe Prognostic Factors and Adjuvant Treatments for Surgically Treated Cancers of the Biliary Tract: A Multicentre Study of the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology (ASMO)(Asian Pacific Organization Cancer Prevention, 2014) Unal, Olcun Umit; Oztop, Ilhan; Kos, Tugba; Turan, Nedim; Kucukoner, Mehmet; Helvaci, Kaan; Berk, VeliBackground: Biliary tract cancers are rare, and surgical resection is the standard treatment at early stages. However, reports on the benefits of adjuvant treatment following surgical resection are conflicting. This study aimed to evaluate the factors affecting survival and adjuvant treatments in patients with surgically treated biliary tract cancers. Materials and Methods: Patient clinical features, adjuvant treatments, and efficacy and prognostic factor data were evaluated. Survival analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0. Results: The median overall survival was 30.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.4-42.9 months). Median survival was 19 months (95% CI, 6-33) for patients treated with fluorouracil based chemotherapy and 53 months (95% CI, 33.2-78.8) with gemcitabine based chemotherapy (p=0.033). On univariate analysis, poor prognostic factors for survival were galbladder localization, perineural invasion, hepatic invasion, a lack of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy treatment, and a lack of lymph node dissection. On multivariate analysis, perineural invasion was a poor prognostic factor (p=0.008). Conclusions: Biliary tract cancers generally have poor prognoses. The main factors affecting survival are tumour localization, perineural invasion, hepatic invasion, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and lymph node dissection. Gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy is more effective than 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.Öğe Prognostic factors for gemcitabine-refractory patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis of a multicentre study (Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology)(Termedia Publishing House Ltd, 2015) Inal, Ali; Kos, F. Tuba; Algin, Efnan; Yildiz, Ramazan; Berk, Veli; Unek, Ilkay T.; Colak, DilsenAim of the study: Systemic chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer has limited impact on overall survival (OS). Patients eligible for chemotherapy should be selected carefully. The aim of the study was to search for prognostic factors for survival in patients with gemcitabine (Gem)-refractory or with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis)-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with Gem-or GemCis-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. Sixteen potential prognostic variables were chosen for analysis in this study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with survival. Univariate and multivariate statistical methods were used to determine prognostic factors. Results: Multivariate analysis included the four prognostic significance factors in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that liver metastasis and second-line chemotherapy were considered independent prognostic factors for survival. Conclusions: Liver metastasis and second-line chemotherapy were identified as important prognostic factors in advanced pancreatic cancer patients refractory to treatment with Gem or GemCis. This prognostic factors may also facilitate pretreatment prediction of survival and can be used for selecting patients for treatment.Öğe Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Treated With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeting Agents(Asian Pacific Organization Cancer Prevention, 2012) Cetin, Bulent; Kaplan, Mehmet Ali; Berk, Veli; Ozturk, Selcuk Cemil; Benekli, Mustafa; Isikdogan, Abdurrahman; Ozkan, MetinObjective: Angiogenesis represents a key element in the pathogenesis of malignancy. There are no robust data on prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy. The present study was conducted to establish a prognostic model for patients using an oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Baseline characteristics and outcomes on 170 patients treated with FOLFIRI or XELOX plus anti-VEGF therapy-naive metastatic colorectal cancer were collected from three Turkey cancer centers. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify independent prognostic factors for OS. Results: The median OS for the whole cohort was 19 months (95% CI, 14.3 to 23.6 months). Three of the seven adverse prognostic factors according to the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology (ASMO) were independent predictors of short survival: serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) greater than the upper limit of normal (ULN; p<0.001); neutrophils greater than the ULN (p<0.0014); and progression free survival (PFS) less than 6 months (p=0.001). Conclusion: Serum LDH and neutrophil levels were the main prognostic factors in predicting survival, followed by PFS. This model validates incorporation of components of the ASMO model into patient care and clinical trials that use VEGF-targeting agents.Öğe Results of Adjuvant FOLFOX Regimens in Stage III Colorectal Cancer Patients: Retrospective Analysis of 667 Patients(Karger, 2013) Uncu, Dogan; Aksoy, Sercan; Cetin, Bulent; Yetisyigit, Tarkan; Ozdemir, Nuriye; Berk, Veli; Dane, FaysalObjective: The aim of this study was to assess the use of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimens in clinical practice according to their efficacy and toxicity. Methods: Patients who received oxaliplatin-containing regimens after curative resection for colorectal carcinoma from 10 different oncology centers between May 2004 and December 2009 were included in the study. All patients were treated with FOLFOX regimens. Patients with rectal carcinoma were also treated with chemoradiotherapy with 5-FU after 2 cycles of a FOLFOX regimen. Results: The median age of the patients was 56 years (range 17-78). Of the total 667 patients, 326 were given FOLFOX-4, 232 were given modified FOLFOX-4 and 109 were given FOLFOX-6. The distribution according to disease stage was 33 patients with stage IIIA colorectal cancer, 382 patients with stage IIIB and 252 patients with stage IIIC. The most common adverse events were neutropenia (54%), nausea (36.9%), neuropathy (38.2%) and anemia (33.1%) for all grades. The median follow-up time was 23 months (range 1-79). Three-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 65 and 85.7%, respectively. Conclusion: The different oxaliplatin-containing 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in patients with stage III colorectal cancer seemed to be at least equal in terms of efficacy regardless of the method of 5-FU administration or oxaliplatin dose. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, BaselÖğe XELOX vs. FOLFOX4 as Second Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer(H G E Update Medical Publishing S A, 2012) Berk, Veli; Ozdemir, Nuriye; Ozkan, Metin; Aksoy, Sercan; Turan, Nedim; Inal, Ali; Balakan, OzanBackground/Aims: The efficacy and tolerability of oxaliplatin in combination with either folinic acid, fluorouracil (5-FU) (FOLFOX4 regimen) or capecitabine (XELOX regimen) was evaluated in advanced pancreatic cancer. Methodology: In this study, eighty-five patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled after failing to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy between November 2005 and August 2011. FOLFOX4 was repeated every two weeks and XELOX regimen was repeated every three weeks until either disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Results: Eighty-five patients were evaluated for tumor response. Seven patients (18%) achieved a partial response with XELOX and stable disease was observed in 16 patients (41%). Eight patients (17%) achieved a partial response with FOLFOX4 and stable disease was observed in 12 patients (26%). Disease control rates were 59% in the XELOX arm and 43% in the FOLFOX4 arm. The median time to progression was 16 weeks in both arms. The median overall survival was 21 weeks with XELOX and 25 weeks with FOLFOX4. Conclusions: Oxaliplatin-based combination therapy showed moderate clinical activity with acceptable toxicity in patients who had progressive disease after receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic cancer. We conclude that XELOX is similar in terms of efficacy and toxicity profile to FOLFOX4 in the second-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.
