Yazar "Bayan, K." seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Correlation of Tumour Markers in Ascitic Fluid and Serum: Are Measurements of Ascitic Tumour Markers a Futile Attempt?(Field House Publishing Llp, 2009) Tuzun, Y.; Celik, Y.; Bayan, K.; Yilmaz, S.; Dursun, M.; Canoruc, F.Correlations between tumour markers in ascitic fluid and serum were investigated to determine whether ascitic fluid analysis had any diagnostic advantage over serum in 91 adults with ascites (55 malign; 36 benign). Serum and ascitic fluid were analysed for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen (CA) 125, CA19.9, CA72.4, CA15.3, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA). The tumour markers were skewed between the groups so were logarithmically transformed. Correlations between serum and ascitic fluid were tested using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Serum and ascitic fluid levels of CEA, CA125, CYFRA and AFP in the malign group were statistically different and CEA, CA19.9, CA5.3, CYFRA and AFP were statistically different in the benign group. For both groups, all tumour markers were highly correlated in serum and ascitic fluid, with the exception of CYFRA in the malign group. These results indicate that, where malignant ascites is suspected, analysing tumour markers in ascitic fluid does not have any advantage over serum analysis.Öğe Effects of entecavir, tenofovir and telbivudine treatment on renal functions in chronic hepatitis B patients(Univ Catholique Louvain-Ucl, 2019) Kara, A., V; Yildirim, Y.; Ozcicek, F.; Aldemir, M. N.; Arslan, Y.; Bayan, K.; Celen, M. K.Background and study aims : The aim of this study was to enlighten the controversy about the renal safety of entecavir, tenofovir, and telbivudine treatments in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients by comparing these treatments in real-world conditions. Patients and methods: We retrospectively enrolled 104 treatment-naive patients with CHB monoinfection into our study. Patients were treated with entecavir monotherapy (n=38), tenuflivir monotherapy (n=35), or telbivudine monotherapy (n=31). We then compared and statistically analyzed the effects of these drugs on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over a 24-month follow-up period. Results : In the entecavir group, time-dependent change in eGFR was not statistically significant (p = 0.357). There was a statistically significant increase in eGFR in the telbivudine group at 12 months (p < 0.001) and at 24 months (p < 0.001) and, in contrast, a statistically significant decrease in the tenofovir group at 12 months (p < 0.001) and at 24 months (p < 0.001). There was no significant relationship between entecavir and eGFR change (p = 0.763). We found that tenofovir and telbivudine were independent predictors of eGFR change (decrease in eGFR, p < 0.001 and increase in eGFR, p = 0.001, respectively) Conclusions : We recommend close follow-up of renal functions, especially for patients treated with tenofovir. Telbivudine was superior to the other drugs in terms of renal function. We conclude that an individualized therapy program considering treatment efficacy and side effects is the best option for patients.Öğe Replacement of hystological findings(Wiley, 2007) Yilmaz, S.; Bayan, K.; Tuezuen, Y.; Dursun, M.; Kaplan, A.; Oezmen, S.; Canoruc, F.Because of limitations in biopsy procedure, several non-invasive tests have been developed for predicting the histological findings in chronic hepatitis. A fibrosis (F) score 1 or above and necroinflammation [histological activity index (HAI)] score 4 or above are required to initiate the treatment in chronic viral hepatitis. Literature includes many studies on hyaluronic acid (HA) as a non-invasive procedure in predicting histological findings but lacks on high-sensitive-C-reactive protein (hsCRP). We evaluated the diagnostic value of HA and hsCRP in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Ninety-eight subjects (42 chronic viral hepatitis, 28 cirrhosis and 28 healthy controls) were included in the study. Liver biopsies were performed on 42 chronic hepatitis patients and assessed by Ishak scoring system. All sera were stored at -70 degrees C until assay. Many laboratory parameters related to viral hepatitis, HA and hsCRP were studied following the instructions. We tried to determine a cut-off value for HA to represent >= F1 score and that for hsCRP to represent >= 4 HAI score. Hepatitis B virus was the predominant aetiology of chronic hepatitis in our study. Mean HA levels were 113, 754 and 24 ng/ml in patients with chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and controls, respectively (ANOVA, p < 0.001). A HA level > 64.7 ng/ml had a 100% specificity for diagnosing chronic hepatitis. A value >= 154 ng/ml had a 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value and 90% negative predictive value for diagnosing liver cirrhosis (Area 1.00; p < 0.0001). A cut-off value of 63 ng/ml for HA had a 100% specificity for diagnosing fibrosis score >= 1 in chronic hepatitis (Area 0.86; p < 0.001). An hsCRP level > 0.56 mg/dl had a 100% specificity and 12% sensitivity for diagnosing chronic hepatitis (Area 0.71; p = 0.002), while cut-off of 0.53 mg/dl had 75% specificity for diagnosing HAI >= 4 in chronic hepatitis (Area 0.32; p = 0.132). This study supported the HA level in predicting fibrosis score >= 1 with a cut-off value of 63 ng/ml. Cut-off of 154 ng/ml had a strong worth for cirrhosis. A cut-off of hsCRP for predicting HAI score >= 4 warrants further evaluation in wider study populations. We concluded that we are a bit closer to the strategy for guiding therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis, without a liver biopsy.