Yazar "Aflay, Ugur" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 4 / 4
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Comparison of lornoxicam versus tramadol analgesia for transrectal prostate biopsy: a randomized prospective study
    (Springer, 2008) Olmez, Gonul; Kaya, Sedat; Aflay, Ugur; Sahin, Hayrettin
    Introduction We compared the efficacy of lornoxicam and tramadol to provide analgesia and comfort during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate (TRUSP) as a noninvasive method. Materials and methods A total of 62 men undergoing TRUSP were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized to three groups. Group 1 (n = 21) received 8 mg of lornoxicam, group 2 (n = 21) received 100 mg of tramadol, and group 3 (n = 20) received saline as a control. The drugs were given intramuscularly half an hour prior to the procedure. All patients were asked to indicate the level of pain experienced after the procedure by visual analog score (VAS), and the patient's comfort level was scored by a comfort score. Additionally, the patients were asked if they were willing to undergo a. future TRUSP. Results The data obtained revealed that both experimental groups receiving lornoxicam and tramadol had lower VAS scores compared to the control group (3.4 and 2.4 vs. 6.4, respectively; P < 0.0001). There were also significant differences in VAS scores between group 1 and group 2 (P = 0.027). There was a significant difference in the comfort score between the drug groups and control (P > 0.0001) and between the lornoxicam and tramadol group (P < 0.05). Pain and discomfort were least in the tramadol group. The percentage of patients who would not consent to future TRUSP was lower in the drug groups compared to control (P < 0.0001). But there were not any differences between the drug groups. Conclusions The use of lornoxicam or tramadol for pain relief in TRUSP is a practical, effective and comfortable method compared to the results of the control group. In addition, tramadol was found to be more effective than lornoxicam.
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Prevention of pain and infective complications after transrectal prostate biopsy: A prospective study
    (Springer, 2006) Akay, Ali Ferruh; Akay, Hatice; Aflay, Ugur; Sahin, Hayrettin; Bircan, Kamuran
    Aim: To investigate the effects of lidocaine gel and parenteral antibiotics and povidine lavage in the treatment of pain occurring during prostate biopsy in terms of infective complications. Patients and methods: Eighty patients with indications for prostate biopsy were randomized into two groups. One group underwent lavage with povidine iodine solution and lidocaine gel, and the other received cephtriaxon and lavage. Pain experienced by the patients was measured by visual analog scale (VAS). Blood samples were taken 15 and 60 min after the procedure, and urine culture antibiograms were taken 60 min after the procedure. Results: The average pain score was 3.70 in Group 1 and 4.25 in Group 2; the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Likewise, no statistically significant difference between groups was found by the chi square test in either urine or blood cultures (P > 0.05). Conclusions Lavage with betadine prior to transrectal prostate biopsy is adequate in the prevention of infective complications; however, because lidocaine gel is not effective against pain, alternative methods for pain management need to be developed.
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Risk factors for lower urinary tract infection and bacterial stent colonization in patients with a double J ureteral stent
    (Springer, 2007) Akay, Ali Ferruh; Aflay, Ugur; Gedik, Abdullah; Sahin, Hayrettin; Bircan, Mehmet Kamuran
    Objectives We investigated the potential risk factors for lower urinary tract infection and bacterial stent colonization in patients with double-J stents. Patients and Methods A total of 195 double-J stents from 190 patients (95 men and 95 women, mean age 40.22 years) were examined. In all patients, prophylactic antimicrobial therapy was administered at the time of stenting. The stents and urine samples were removed aseptically and the proximal and distal tip segments of the stents were obtained. Three culture specimens were obtained from each stent segment and urine sample. Chi-square tests, odds ratio, and relative risk were used for the statistical analysis. Results Bacterial colonies were found in 24% (47 of 190) of the urine samples, 31% (61 of 195) of the proximal stent segments, and 34% (67 of 195) of the distal stent segments. Of the pathogens identified, Escherichia coli (34 of 47) was the most common. Diabetes mellitus (P < 0.01), chronic renal failure (P < 0.001), and pregnancy (P < 0.01) were found to be risk factors for lower urinary tract infection in patients with stents. An increased stent colonization rate was associated with implantation time, age, and female sex, but these were not statistically significant for lower urinary tract infection Conclusions Diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, and pregnancy are associated with a higher risk of lower urinary tract infection. Therefore, patients in these categories should be monitored carefully for infectious complications.
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    VESICOURETERAL REFLUX INCIDANCE IN CHILDREN WITH URINARY STONE DISEASE
    (Aves, 2005) Akay, Ali Ferruh; Uzun, Fatih; Akay, Hatice Ozturkmen; Aflay, Ugur; Sahin, Hayrettin
    Introduction: In spite of the frequent association of urinary infection with vesicoureteric reflux and urinary calculi, the coexistence of vesicoureteric reflux and calculi is rare. Four factors (urinary calculi, urinary tract infection, structural changes at the uretero vesical junction and reflux) may interact in these cases. In this prospective study we studied the prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children with urinary stone disease. Materials and Methods: Between September 2000 and March 2004 we evaluated the prevalence of VUR in children with urinary stone disease. In all patients history, physical examination, biochemical and microbiologic analyses were done before the treatment of stone disease. We did voiding cystouretrography in all patients. Patients were divided based on surgical method, including extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), endoscopy and open surgery. Some patients required combined treatment. After the treatment of stone disease, all patients with VUR received suppressive antibiotic treatment. During follow up period surgical treatment was applied when necessary. Results: Fifty children between 1.5 and 13 years old (median 6.75 years) were included in this study. 41 of patients (82%) were male, 9 (18%) were female. In 37 of patients stone was located only in kidney, 8 were located in urethra, 2 had kidney and bladder stones, 2 had kidney and urethra stones simultaneously. Only 1 patient had bladder stone. In 6 patients (3 male, 3 female) VUR was diagnosed with voiding cystouretrography. Of the patients 2 had bilateral reflux (1 patient with bilateral calculi and the other with left kidney and bladder calculi), 2 had right side reflux (1 had urethra calculi and 1 has contralateral kidney calculi), 2 had left side reflux (1 on ipsilateral kidney calculi and 1 on ipsilateral ureteral calculi). The prevalence of VUR was 12%. Conclusion: In children with urinary stone disease one must always remember that VUR can be seen simultaneously. So if necessary VSUG should always be applied. All patients with urinary stones, particularly staghorn calculi, and urinary tract infection have to be examined for vesicouretral reflux, after the stone or stones have been removed and appropriate antimicrobial therapy has been given.