Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSancaktutar, Ahmet Ali
dc.contributor.authorAdanur, Senol
dc.contributor.authorResorlu, Berkan
dc.contributor.authorTepeler, Abdulkadir
dc.contributor.authorZiypak, Tevfik
dc.contributor.authorSoylemez, Haluk
dc.contributor.authorAtar, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T16:15:24Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T16:15:24Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0022-5347
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.089
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/15787
dc.description.abstractPurpose: We conducted a multicenter pediatric study of ureteral stents unintentionally left in situ. Materials and Methods: A total of 22 patients with encrusted Double-J (R) ureteral stents unintentionally left in situ were treated at 4 centers between January 2007 and March 2012. Stone burdens were estimated using plain radiography and computerized tomography. Treatment decision was made based on clinical and radiological findings or stone burden. Results: Nine girls and 13 boys with a mean age of 9.5 years (range 2 to 16) were analyzed. Mean indwelling time of ureteral stent was 21.7 months (range 6 to 60). Stents were inserted for the indication of urolithiasis (17 patients) and reconstructive urological intervention (5). In 2 patients stents had been placed bilaterally. Mean stent stone burden was 184 mm(2) on plain radiography and 247 mm(2) on computerized tomography, a difference that was statistically significant (p = 0.002). Shock wave lithotripsy was done in 6 cases. Endoscopic procedures were performed in all patients, including ureteroscopy in 8, simple stent removal in 7, endoscopic cystolithotripsy in 6, percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 5, retrograde intrarenal surgery in 3 and percutaneous cystolithotripsy in 2. Surgical removal of each stent required a mean of 1.5 interventions and a mean hospital stay of 4.4 days. Conclusions: At experienced centers combined endourological techniques can achieve successful and safe management of forgotten stents even in the pediatric age group. Thus, routine preprocedural tomography is a must in children with forgotten ureteral stents.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Urologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCase Managementen_US
dc.subjectChilden_US
dc.subjectForeign Bodiesen_US
dc.subjectStentsen_US
dc.subjectUreteren_US
dc.titleThe Forgotten Ureteral Stent in Children: From Diagnosis to Treatmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume189en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1054en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1060en_US
dc.departmentDicle Üniversitesien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000315109600087en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84873715957en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23022000en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.089
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record