Dallı, MehmetBahşi, EmrullahŞahbaz, Caferİnce, BayramAkkuş, ZekiErcan, ErtuǧrulAtılgan, Serhat S.2024-04-242024-04-242010Dallı, M., Bahşi, E., Şahbaz, C., İnce, B., Akkuş, Z., Ercan, E. ve diğerleri. (2010). A comparison of microleakage scores of five different types of composite resins. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 24(4), 2122-2126.1310-2818https://doi.org/10.2478/v10133-010-0075-6https://hdl.handle.net/11468/23718This study aimed to perform a comparative assessment of microleakage in Class V cavities among five different composite resins. For this purpose 100 fresh caries-free human permanent molars were randomly assigned to one of five groups (n=20). Clearfil Majesty Esthetic + Clearfil S3 Bond (Group I), TPH Spectrum + Xeno V (Group II), Gradia Direct Anterior + G Bond (GC) (Group III), Premise + Optibond All in One (Group IV) and Charisma + iBond (Group V) were applied and polymerized under LED. Specimens were varnished, immersed in 0.5% methylene and sectioned bucco-palatinally/lingually, and microleakage scores were determined. Gingival and occlusal microleakage scores among groups were statistically significant (p<0.05) (p=0.043, p=0.005). Occlusal microleakage scores for Clearfil Majesty Esthetic and Premise were lower than in the other groups. Charisma had the highest microleakage scores, with no difference among the other groups (p>0.05). In conclusion occlusal and gingival microleakage scores were satisfactory except for Charisma.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessCervical LesionDifferent Composite ResinsMethylene BlueMicroleakageSelf-Etching Adhesive SystemsArticle24421222126WOS:0002847179000172-s2.0-7864978931310.2478/v10133-010-0075-6Q3N/A