Basaran, Emine GoncuAyna, EmrahVallittu, Pekka K.Lassila, Lippo V. J.2024-04-242024-04-2420110001-63571502-3850https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2010.545034https://hdl.handle.net/11468/19030Objective. To compare handmade and computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM)-fabricated fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) composed of a particulate filler composite. Material and methods. Handmade FDPs were made of restorative composite (Z 100) and CAD-CAM-fabricated FDPs were made of commercial CAD-CAM blocks (VITA Temp) and two experimental CAD-CAM blocks of particulate filler composite. Experimental CAD composite A was prepared by mixing 31.2 wt.% of dimethacrylate resin with 68.7 wt.% of filler particles of barium oxide silicate (BaSiO2). Experimental CAD composite B was prepared by mixing 25.6 wt.% of dimethacrylate resin with 74.3 wt.% of filler particles of BaSiO2. Six groups were fabricated (n = 6 in each); FDPs were statically loaded until final fracture. Results. Experimental CAD composites A and B revealed the highest load-bearing capacity of the FDPs, while Z 100 showed the lowest. Conclusion. FDPs made of experimental CAD composite blocks showed higher load-bearing capacities than handmade commercial composites and commercial blocks.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessExperimental CompositeFixed Dental ProsthesesLoad-Bearing CapacityArticle693144150WOS:0002895618000032-s2.0-799550218442120802310.3109/00016357.2010.545034Q2Q3