Ozevren, H.Cetin, A.Hattapoglu, S.Baloglu, M.2024-04-242024-04-2420221119-3077https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_1511_21https://hdl.handle.net/11468/19569Aim: This article aims to study the clinical outcomes in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) who underwent burr hole drainage or craniotomy. Patients and Methods: The length of hospitalization, Glasgow outcome scales (GOS) of patients undergoing burr-hole drainage or craniotomy, were evaluated and compared statistically. In this study, we also evaluated the relationship by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: The sex and age distribution and specific clinical parameters of the patients were investigated. In this study, we provide the evidence of the GOS and length of hospitalization findings of the patients and the superiority of burr hole drainage over craniotomy. Conclusions: Chronic subdural hematoma responds better to burr hole drainage with shorter hospitalization and improved Glasgow score.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessBurr Hole DrainageChronic Subdural HematomaCraniotomyBurr hole and craniotomy in the treatment of subdural hematoma: A comparative studyBurr hole and craniotomy in the treatment of subdural hematoma: A comparative studyArticle25710561060WOS:0008844979000122-s2.0-851347403253585946510.4103/njcp.njcp_1511_21Q2Q4