Investigation of the monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio as a prognostic criterion in burn patients
Yükleniyor...
Tarih
2023
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Özet
In this study, it was aimed to investigate the monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio as a prognostic criterion in adult burn patients. A descriptive and cross-sectional method was adopted in this study. The sample included 177 patients with burn injuries. This study was conducted in a research and training hospital in Turkey. Data were collected by the researchers in the burn unit. Descriptive methods, Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney U, ROC curve, and correlation analyses were used for the statistical analyses of the data. While 66.1% of the patients were second-degree burn patients, 96.6% of all patients recovered and were discharged from the hospital, and the rest died. In this study, the monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratios of the patients decreased as their clinical condition worsened. The mean C-reactive protein value of the patients was 8.52 ± 5.02 on the 7th day. A statistically significant correlation was found between an increase in monocyte counts and a decrease in high-density lipoprotein concentrations at the 24th hour, 3rd day and 7th day after the burn (p < 0.01). The monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio can be considered a biomarker in the identification and follow-up of sepsis and morbidity durations in burn patients. A low monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio in burn patients can provide an insight into the severity of sepsis.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Burn injuries, C-reactive protein, High-density lipoprotein, Monocyte, Monocyte/high-density lipoprotein
Kaynak
Wound Repair and Regeneration
WoS Q Değeri
N/A
Scopus Q Değeri
Q1
Cilt
31
Sayı
2
Künye
Akkoç, M. F., Bülbüloğlu, S., Kapı, E., Bayram, M. ve Gurgah, T. (2023). Investigation of the monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio as a prognostic criterion in burn patients. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 31(2), 233-239.
