Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkça, Berivan Özbudak
dc.contributor.authorErdoğan, Ebru
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-19T07:11:59Z
dc.date.available2021-08-19T07:11:59Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationAkça, B.Ö. ve Erdoğan, E. (2021). One more coincide between architects and laypersons on the aesthetics of Zaha Hadid's buildings. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 9(1), 220-241.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2147-9380
dc.identifier.urihttps://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/452/285
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11468/7360
dc.descriptionWOS:000681445000010
dc.description.abstractPurposeThis study focuses on the subject of environmentalaesthetics and aims to identify the differences and similarities that emerge in the general aesthetic evaluations toward the individual style, particularly examining the physical and connotative meanings in the buildings by Zaha Hadid. The study further seeks to understand how individual style fosters aesthetic awareness or common perceptions on a universal level without causing a cultural difference. Design/Methodology/ApproachA survey was conducted to understand the visual aesthetic evaluations of architects and laypersons over 16 buildings of Hadid—an architect who managed to develop her own individual style.The visual images created were evaluated in terms of sensorialand physical concepts in order tounderstand whether there was a common language by evaluating the aesthetic perceptions of subjectswith different backgrounds, and to reveal the effect of individual style in forming a universal tongue.Descriptive statics, correlation analysis and independent t test were performed to conduct the evaluations.FindingsAccording to analysis results, the rhythm and organic lines of a building are the most significant elements for building façades and masses in aesthetic evaluations. In addition, no significant differences regarding the dimensions of “liking”, “ornate”, “attractive”, “meaningful” and “warm” were found between the groups. Research Limitations/ImplicationsThe survey was conducted betweentwo different subject groups;architectsand laypersons. Specific parameters related to the sensorialconcepts of the buildings were used. These parameters included the concepts of liking, pleasant, complex, familiar, meaningful, ornate and warm, while for the physical characteristics of the buildings, the concepts of regular/ irregular, full/ empty, rhythmic/ arrhythmic, soft/ hard, meaningful/meaningless and symmetric/asymmetric were used. Originality/ValueThis study is significant insofar as it is among the rare research studies that found there to be no differences between architects and laypersons but rather, similarities between them.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKonya Technical Universityen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.15320/ICONARP.2021.157en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectArchitecten_US
dc.subjectExperimental aestheticen_US
dc.subjectIndividual styleen_US
dc.subjectLaypersonen_US
dc.subjectZaha Hadiden_US
dc.titleOne more coincide between architects and laypersons on the aesthetics of Zaha Hadid's buildingsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage220en_US
dc.identifier.endpage241en_US
dc.relation.journalICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planningen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDicle Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi, Mimarlık Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-9457-9145en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAkça, Berivan Özbudak


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record